• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心在腭咽功能不全内镜评估中的评分者间及评分者内信度

Multicenter interrater and intrarater reliability in the endoscopic evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

作者信息

Sie Kathleen C Y, Starr Jacqueline R, Bloom David C, Cunningham Michael, de Serres Lianne M, Drake Amelia F, Elluru Ravindhra G, Haddad Joseph, Hartnick Christopher, Macarthur Carol, Milczuk Henry A, Muntz Harlan R, Perkins Jonathan A, Senders Craig, Smith Marshall E, Tollefson Travis, Willging Jay Paul, Zdanski Carlton J

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Childhood Communication Center, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, PO Box 5371/6E-1, Seattle, WA 98105-0371, USA.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jul;134(7):757-63. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.7.757.

DOI:10.1001/archotol.134.7.757
PMID:18645127
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore interrater and intrarater reliability (R (inter) and R (intra), respectively) of a standardized scale applied to nasoendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal (VP) function, across multiple centers.

DESIGN

Multicenter blinded R (inter) and R (intra) study.

SETTING

Eight academic tertiary care centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen otolaryngologists from 8 centers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Raters estimated lateral pharyngeal and palatal movement on nasoendoscopic tapes from 50 different patients. Raters were asked to (1) estimate gap size during phonation and (2) note the presence of the Passavant ridge, a midline palatal notch on the nasal surface of the soft palate, and aberrant pulsations. Primary outcome measures were R (inter) and R (intra) coefficients for estimated gap size, lateral wall, and palatal movement; kappa coefficients for the Passavant ridge, a midline palatal notch on the nasal soft palate, and aberrant pulsations were also calculated.

RESULTS

The R (inter) coefficients were 0.63 for estimated gap size, 0.41 for lateral wall movement, and 0.43 for palate movement; corresponding R (intra) coefficients were 0.86, 0.79, and 0.83, respectively. Interrater kappa values for qualitative features were 0.10 for the Passavant ridge; 0.48 for a notch on the nasal surface of the soft palate, 0.56 for aberrant pulsations, and 0.39 for estimation of gap size.

CONCLUSIONS

In these data, there was good R (intra) and fair R (inter) when using the Golding-Kushner scale for rating VP function based on nasoendoscopy. Estimates of VP gap size demonstrate higher reliability coefficients than total lateral wall, mean palate estimates, and categorical estimate of gap size. The reliability of rating qualitative characteristics (ie, the presence of the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and notch on the nasal surface of the soft palate) is variable.

摘要

目的

在多个中心探讨应用于鼻咽部(VP)功能鼻内镜评估的标准化量表的评分者间信度和评分者内信度(分别为R(inter)和R(intra))。

设计

多中心盲法R(inter)和R(intra)研究。

地点

8家学术性三级医疗中心。

参与者

来自8个中心的16名耳鼻喉科医生。

主要观察指标

评分者根据50例不同患者的鼻内镜录像估计咽侧壁和腭部的运动情况。要求评分者(1)估计发声时的间隙大小,(2)记录帕萨凡特嵴(软腭鼻面的中线腭切迹)的存在情况以及异常搏动。主要观察指标为估计间隙大小、侧壁和腭部运动的R(inter)和R(intra)系数;还计算了帕萨凡特嵴、软腭鼻面的中线腭切迹以及异常搏动的kappa系数。

结果

估计间隙大小的R(inter)系数为0.63,侧壁运动的为0.41,腭部运动的为0.43;相应的R(intra)系数分别为0.86、0.79和0.83。定性特征的评分者间kappa值,帕萨凡特嵴为0.10;软腭鼻面切迹为0.48,异常搏动为0.56,间隙大小估计为0.39。

结论

在这些数据中,使用戈尔丁 - 库什纳量表基于鼻内镜对VP功能进行评分时,R(intra)良好,R(inter)尚可。VP间隙大小的估计显示出比咽侧壁整体、腭部平均估计以及间隙大小分类估计更高的信度系数。对定性特征(即帕萨凡特嵴、异常搏动和软腭鼻面切迹的存在)评分的信度存在差异。

相似文献

1
Multicenter interrater and intrarater reliability in the endoscopic evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency.多中心在腭咽功能不全内镜评估中的评分者间及评分者内信度
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jul;134(7):757-63. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.7.757.
2
Interrater and intrarater reliability in the evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency within a single institution.单一机构内腭咽功能不全评估中的评分者间和评分者内信度
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Sep;132(9):947-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.9.947.
3
Multicenter Interrater Reliability in the Endoscopic Assessment of Velopharyngeal Function Using a Video Instruction Tool.使用视频指导工具评估腭咽功能的内镜评估中的多中心评估者间可靠性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Apr;160(4):720-728. doi: 10.1177/0194599818822989. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function.在将评分量表应用于鼻内镜下腭咽功能评估方面达成共识。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;138(10):923-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.2013.203.
5
Interrater reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy.药物诱导睡眠内镜检查的评分者间可靠性。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;136(4):393-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.26.
6
Nasoendoscopic findings after primary palatal surgery: can the Furlow technique result in a smaller velopharyngeal gap?初次腭裂手术后的鼻内镜检查结果:Furlow技术会导致咽腭间隙更小吗?
Codas. 2015 Jul-Aug;27(4):365-71. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014160.
7
A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength.用于评估盆底肌肉力量的会阴压力计与布林克评分的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1583-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.015.
8
Study of the normal and insufficient velopharyngeal valve by the "Forced Sucking Test".
Laryngoscope. 1991 Nov;101(11):1203-12. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199111000-00008.
9
Reliability of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden scale in a multicenter trial for dystonia.伯克-法恩-马斯登量表在肌张力障碍多中心试验中的可靠性。
Mov Disord. 2007 Apr 15;22(5):685-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21392.
10
Evaluation of VPI-assessment with videofluoroscopy and nasoendoscopy.通过视频荧光透视检查和鼻内镜检查评估腭咽闭合不全
Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Oct;58(7):922-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.012.

引用本文的文献

1
An Exploratory Investigation into the Influence of Nasopharyngoscopy Findings on VPI Surgery Selection.鼻咽喉镜检查结果对腭咽闭合不全手术选择影响的探索性研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Jul 15:10556656251359180. doi: 10.1177/10556656251359180.
2
Factors That Limit Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Closure During Nasopharyngoscopy.鼻咽喉镜检查时限制腭咽闭合评估的因素。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Feb;62(2):300-308. doi: 10.1177/10556656241304224. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
3
Can MRI Replace Nasopharyngoscopy in the Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency?
在评估腭咽闭合不全方面,磁共振成像(MRI)能否取代鼻咽镜检查?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Mar 15:10556656241239459. doi: 10.1177/10556656241239459.
4
Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study of Revision Palatoplasty Versus Pharyngoplasty for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Cleft Palate Repair.腭裂修复术后并发咽鼓管功能不良的前瞻性观察性研究:经软腭修补术与咽成形术治疗的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 May;61(5):870-881. doi: 10.1177/10556656221147159. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Speech Outcomes After Sphincter Pharyngoplasty for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.咽缩肌成形术治疗腭咽闭合不全的语音效果。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):E2046-E2052. doi: 10.1002/lary.29189. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Revision Surgery of the Cleft Palate.腭裂修复手术
Semin Plast Surg. 2020 May;34(2):120-128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709429. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Can Dynamic MRI Be Used to Accurately Identify Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns?动态磁共振成像能否用于准确识别腭咽闭合模式?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Apr;55(4):499-507. doi: 10.1177/1055665617735998. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate.唇腭裂患者的鼻内镜视频检查与言语听觉感知评估的比较
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;17(3):265-73. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000300006.
9
In search of the optimal surgical treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a systematic review.探讨 22q11.2 缺失综合征患者伴发软腭功能障碍的最佳手术治疗方法:系统综述
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034332. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
Velopharyngeal insufficiency: diagnosis and management.腭咽闭合不全:诊断与治疗
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Aug;17(4):302-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832cbd6b.