Tieu David D, Gerber Mark E, Milczuk Henry A, Parikh Sanjay R, Perkins Jonathan A, Yoon Patricia J, Sie Kathleen C Y
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;138(10):923-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.2013.203.
To generate consensus ratings of velopharyngeal function on nasendoscopy (NE) with the goal of creating a video instruction tool.
The American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Study Group convened to identify NE segments to be included in an instructional video. Of 24 segments reviewed, 11 were selected based on the quality of the examinations and spectrum of closure patterns. Participating otolaryngologists independently rated NE segments using the Golding-Kushner scale. The participants then convened and rated each of the NE segments as a group. Thirty-nine members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology met and agreed with the group ratings, creating a consensus standard.
Individual scores for palate and lateral wall motion showed high variability, ranging from 0 to 6 points difference from the consensus. Variability was also seen for the following qualitative findings: the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and dorsal palatal notch. The individual ratings are presented graphically to demonstrate the range of individual responses as well as to compare responses to the consensus ratings. No further changes were made to the proposed consensus ratings when reviewed by the larger group.
Rating of NE evaluations of velopharyngeal function was variable among a group of pediatric otolaryngologists experienced in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency. These results highlight the need to develop a standardized method of reporting NE findings for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Despite this, consensus ratings were achieved that will facilitate development of a video instruction tool.
对鼻内镜检查(NE)时的腭咽功能进行共识性评分,目标是创建一个视频指导工具。
美国儿科学会耳鼻咽喉科腭咽功能不全研究小组召开会议,确定纳入教学视频的鼻内镜检查片段。在审查的24个片段中,根据检查质量和闭合模式范围选择了11个。参与的耳鼻咽喉科医生使用戈尔丁-库什纳量表对鼻内镜检查片段进行独立评分。然后参与者们聚在一起,对每个鼻内镜检查片段进行集体评分。39名美国儿科学会耳鼻咽喉科成员开会并同意了集体评分,制定了一个共识标准。
软腭和侧壁运动的个人评分显示出高度变异性,与共识评分相差0至6分。以下定性结果也存在变异性:帕萨万特嵴、异常搏动和腭背切迹。以图表形式呈现个人评分,以展示个人反应范围,并将反应与共识评分进行比较。当由更大的群体进行审查时,提议的共识评分没有进一步更改。
在一组有治疗腭咽功能不全经验的儿科耳鼻咽喉科医生中,对腭咽功能的鼻内镜评估评分存在差异。这些结果凸显了为腭咽功能不全制定标准化鼻内镜检查结果报告方法的必要性。尽管如此,还是达成了共识评分,这将有助于视频指导工具的开发。