• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.原位声级校准对畸变产物耳声发射变异性的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):288-300. doi: 10.1121/1.2931953.
2
Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.校准方法对畸变产物耳声发射测量的影响:II. 阈值预测。
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):546-54. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d86b59.
3
Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.校准方法对 4 kHz 及附近畸变产物耳声发射测量的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):779-88. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182994f15.
4
Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.正向和发射压力校准对重复探头适配时的耳声发射测量变异性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1345-1358. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000714.
5
Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.真耳声级测量中驻波误差的分布。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 May;129(5):3134-40. doi: 10.1121/1.3569726.
6
Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.校准方法对畸变产物耳声发射测量的影响:I. 测试性能。
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):533-45. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d86b3d.
7
The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.常见刺激参数对畸变产物耳声发射精细结构的影响。
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):239-49. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182321da4.
8
Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.外耳道驻波对畸变产物耳声发射测量的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec;98(6):3200-14. doi: 10.1121/1.413810.
9
Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.测量耳声发射时补偿外耳道声学特性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):515. doi: 10.1121/1.4973618.
10
Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.纯音测听与正向声压级校准相结合可显著提高测试-重测信度的临床相关性。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):946-957. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000555.

引用本文的文献

1
Cochlear Tuning in Early Aging Estimated with Three Methods.用三种方法估计早期衰老中的耳蜗调谐。
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251364675. doi: 10.1177/23312165251364675. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
The effects of broadband elicitor duration on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and a psychoacoustic measure of gain reduction.宽带刺激持续时间对瞬态诱发耳声发射及增益降低的心理声学测量的影响。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 2:rs.3.rs-6753082. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6753082/v1.
3
The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range.扩展高频范围内畸变产物耳声发射与听阈之间的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Mar 1;157(3):1889-1898. doi: 10.1121/10.0036143.
4
The Ins and Outs of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth: A Review.畸变产物耳声发射增长的来龙去脉:综述
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb;26(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00969-8. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
5
Detection of mild sensory hearing loss using a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile.利用联合反射-失真耳声发射谱检测轻度感觉神经性听力损失。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Oct 1;156(4):2220-2236. doi: 10.1121/10.0030399.
6
The relationship and interdependence of auditory thresholds, proposed behavioural measures of hidden hearing loss, and physiological measures of auditory function.听觉阈值、所提出的隐匿性听力损失行为测量指标以及听觉功能生理测量指标之间的关系和相互依存性。
Int J Audiol. 2025 Jan;64(1):11-24. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2391986. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
7
The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range.扩展高频范围内畸变产物耳声发射与听力阈值之间的关系。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 10:2024.07.05.601801. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.05.601801.
8
The influence of tympanic-membrane orientation on acoustic ear-canal quantities: A finite-element analysis.鼓膜方位对中耳声导抗的影响:有限元分析。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Apr 1;155(4):2769-2785. doi: 10.1121/10.0025768.
9
Predicting wideband real-ear-to-coupler differences in children using wideband acoustic immittance.使用宽带声导抗预测儿童的宽带真耳-耦合差。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Aug 1;154(2):991-1002. doi: 10.1121/10.0020660.
10
Characterizing a Joint Reflection-Distortion OAE Profile in Humans With Endolymphatic Hydrops.特发性膜迷路积水患者的联合声反射-失真耳声发射特征。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(6):1437-1450. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001387. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.比较通过压缩、抑制和频谱平滑测量的刺激频率耳声发射。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3562-75. doi: 10.1121/1.2793604.
2
Developing standards for distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.制定畸变产物耳声发射测量标准。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2203-14. doi: 10.1121/1.2770543.
3
A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.畸变产物耳声发射数据多变量分析的验证及潜在临床应用
Ear Hear. 2005 Dec;26(6):593-607. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000188108.08713.6c.
4
A determination of the normal threshold of hearing and its relation to the standardization of audiometers.听力正常阈值的测定及其与听力计标准化的关系。
J Laryngol Otol. 1952 Aug;66(8):366-78. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100047812.
5
Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.通过畸变产物耳声发射测量进行的耳蜗压缩估计
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1499-507. doi: 10.1121/1.1604122.
6
Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.人耳道中的声强、声阻抗和反射系数。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Aug;112(2):600-20. doi: 10.1121/1.1494445.
7
Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.正常听力和听力受损的人耳中的畸变产物耳声发射输入/输出函数。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Dec;110(6):3119-31. doi: 10.1121/1.1417524.
8
Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.在人类中高频测量的畸变产物耳声发射。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Nov;110(5 Pt 1):2456-69. doi: 10.1121/1.1406497.
9
Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.当使用2f1-f2和2f2-f1来预测听觉状态时畸变产物耳声发射测试的性能。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Apr;107(4):2128-35. doi: 10.1121/1.428494.
10
Methods for estimating the sound pressure at the eardrum.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):1977-92. doi: 10.1121/1.427945.

原位声级校准对畸变产物耳声发射变异性的影响。

Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

作者信息

Scheperle Rachel A, Neely Stephen T, Kopun Judy G, Gorga Michael P

机构信息

Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):288-300. doi: 10.1121/1.2931953.

DOI:10.1121/1.2931953
PMID:18646977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2562746/
Abstract

Standing waves can cause errors during in-the-ear calibration of sound pressure level (SPL), affecting both stimulus magnitude and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level. Sound intensity level (SIL) and forward pressure level (FPL) are two measurements theoretically unaffected by standing waves. SPL, SIL, and FPL in situ calibrations were compared by determining sensitivity of DPOAE level to probe-insertion depth (deep and "shallow") for a range of stimulus frequencies (1-8 kHz) and levels (20-60 dB). Probe-insertion depth was manipulated with the intent to shift the frequencies with standing-wave minima at the emission probe, introducing variability during SPL calibration. The absolute difference in DPOAE level between insertions was evaluated after correcting for an incidental change caused by the effect of ear-canal impedance on the emission traveling from the cochlea. A three-way analysis of variance found significant main effects for stimulus level, stimulus frequency, and calibration method, as well as significant interactions involving calibration method. All calibration methods exhibited changes in DPOAE level due to the insertion depth, especially above 4 kHz. However, SPL demonstrated the greatest changes across all stimulus levels for frequencies above 2 kHz, suggesting that SIL and FPL provide more consistent measurements of DPOAEs for frequencies susceptible to standing-wave calibration errors.

摘要

驻波会在耳内声压级(SPL)校准过程中导致误差,影响刺激强度和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)水平。声强级(SIL)和正向声压级(FPL)是理论上不受驻波影响的两种测量方法。通过确定一系列刺激频率(1 - 8 kHz)和强度(20 - 60 dB)下DPOAE水平对探头插入深度(深和“浅”)的敏感度,比较了原位校准中的SPL、SIL和FPL。通过操纵探头插入深度,使发射探头处的驻波最小值频率发生偏移,从而在SPL校准过程中引入变异性。在校正了耳道阻抗对从耳蜗传出的发射信号的影响所导致的偶然变化后,评估了插入之间DPOAE水平的绝对差异。三因素方差分析发现刺激强度、刺激频率和校准方法有显著的主效应,以及涉及校准方法的显著交互作用。所有校准方法都表现出由于插入深度导致的DPOAE水平变化,特别是在4 kHz以上。然而,对于2 kHz以上的频率,SPL在所有刺激强度下的变化最大,这表明对于易受驻波校准误差影响的频率,SIL和FPL能提供更一致的DPOAE测量结果。