Bloor Michael, Gannon Maria, Hay Gordon, Jackson Graham, Leyland Alastair H, McKeganey Neil
Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6PW.
BMJ. 2008 Jul 22;337:a478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a478.
To examine the "Scottish effect"-namely, the growing divergence between mortality in Scotland and England that is not explained by national differences in levels of deprivation-and, more specifically, to examine the extent to which the Scottish effect is explained by cross national differences in the prevalence of problem drug use.
Secondary analysis of cohort study (the DORIS study).
1033 Scottish drug users recruited to the cohort study in 33 drug treatment facilities across Scotland in 2001-2 and followed up 33 months later in 2004-5.
38 deaths occurred in the cohort, giving a standardised mortality ratio for the cohort of 1244 (95% credible interval 876 to 1678). Only 22 of the 38 deaths in drug users were classified as drug related deaths. From estimates of the size of the problem drug using populations in both England and Scotland, the contribution of deaths in drug users to national death rates can be estimated: the attributable risk fraction for Scotland is 17.3% (12.3% to 22.8%) and that for England is 11.1% (7.8% to 14.8%). Excluding estimated numbers of deaths in drug users would bring down age standardised mortality at ages 15-54 years from 196 to 162 per 100,000 in Scotland and from 138 to 122 per 100,000 in England; 32.0% (22.3% to 43.0%) of the excess mortality in Scotland is due to drug use.
Although problem drug use is a low prevalence risk behaviour, it carries a high mortality; the standardised mortality ratio for Scottish drug users is 12 times as high as for the general population. The higher prevalence of problem drug use in Scotland than in England accounts for a third of Scotland's excess mortality over England. Successful public health efforts to reduce the prevalence of problem drug use in Scotland or deaths in Scottish drug users would have a dramatic impact on overall mortality in Scotland.
研究“苏格兰效应”,即苏格兰与英格兰死亡率之间日益扩大的差异,这种差异无法用两国贫困水平的差异来解释;更具体地说,研究问题药物使用流行率的跨国差异在多大程度上解释了苏格兰效应。
队列研究(多丽丝研究)的二次分析。
2001 - 2002年在苏格兰33个药物治疗机构招募到队列研究中的1033名苏格兰药物使用者,并于2004 - 2005年33个月后进行随访。
队列中有38人死亡,该队列的标准化死亡率为1244(95%可信区间876至1678)。38名药物使用者死亡中只有22例被归类为与药物相关的死亡。根据英格兰和苏格兰问题药物使用人群规模的估计,可以估算出药物使用者死亡对国家死亡率的贡献:苏格兰的归因风险分数为17.3%(12.3%至22.8%),英格兰为11.1%(7.8%至14.8%)。排除药物使用者的估计死亡人数将使苏格兰15 - 54岁年龄标准化死亡率从每10万人196例降至162例,英格兰从每10万人138例降至122例;苏格兰32.0%(22.3%至43.0%)的额外死亡率归因于药物使用。
尽管问题药物使用是一种低流行率的风险行为,但它导致的死亡率很高;苏格兰药物使用者的标准化死亡率是普通人群的12倍。苏格兰问题药物使用的流行率高于英格兰,这解释了苏格兰比英格兰多出的三分之一的额外死亡率。在苏格兰成功开展公共卫生工作以降低问题药物使用的流行率或苏格兰药物使用者的死亡率,将对苏格兰的总体死亡率产生巨大影响。