• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于处于第二次缓解期的65 - 70岁美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,延长辅助使用利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant rituximab for US patients aged 65-70 years with follicular lymphoma in second remission.

作者信息

Hayslip John W, Simpson Kit N

机构信息

Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Jun;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020.

DOI:10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020
PMID:18650180
Abstract

PURPOSE

A recent Intergroup trial showed that receiving adjuvant rituximab after having a second remission from follicular lymphoma (FL) improved progression-free and overall survival (OS). The current study was conducted to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this strategy in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We constructed a transition state model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of extended adjuvant rituximab for 2 years for patients having a second FL remission. Event-free and OS rates were estimated from the recently published Intergroup trial. These were adjusted to reflect the contribution of non-cancer-specific mortality for patients aged 65-70 years, a more commonly affected age group than in the Intergroup trial, which had a median age of 54 years. Previously reported quality of life and cost estimates were obtained from peer-reviewed sources.

RESULTS

Five years after a second induction with R-CHOP (rituximab with cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/ prednisone), disease-free survival is expected to be 47% and 22%, and the OS rates are estimated to be 73% and 61% for extended adjuvant rituximab and observation, respectively, during the second remission. The discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the addition of adjuvant rituximab is estimated to be $19,522 per quality-adjusted life-years gained.

CONCLUSION

Extended adjuvant rituximab offers a clinical benefit to patients aged 65-70 years who have a second remission from FL at a cost generally acceptable to the US healthcare system.

摘要

目的

一项近期的国际协作组试验表明,滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)二次缓解后接受辅助性利妥昔单抗治疗可改善无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)。本研究旨在确定该策略在美国的增量成本效益比。

患者与方法

我们构建了一个过渡状态模型,以估计FL二次缓解患者接受2年延长辅助性利妥昔单抗治疗的增量成本效益比。无事件生存期和总生存率根据近期发表的国际协作组试验进行估计。这些数据进行了调整,以反映65 - 70岁患者非癌症特异性死亡率的影响,该年龄组比国际协作组试验中更常受影响,国际协作组试验的中位年龄为54岁。先前报道的生活质量和成本估计来自同行评审的资料。

结果

在第二次使用R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱/泼尼松)诱导治疗5年后,预计无病生存率分别为47%和22%,第二次缓解期间延长辅助性利妥昔单抗组和观察组的总生存率分别估计为73%和61%。添加辅助性利妥昔单抗的贴现增量成本效益比估计为每获得一个质量调整生命年19,522美元。

结论

延长辅助性利妥昔单抗为65 - 70岁FL二次缓解的患者带来了临床益处,其成本在美国医疗保健系统通常可接受的范围内。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant rituximab for US patients aged 65-70 years with follicular lymphoma in second remission.对于处于第二次缓解期的65 - 70岁美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,延长辅助使用利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Jun;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020.
2
Cost utility in the United States of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone for the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤在美国的成本效益。
Cancer. 2005 Apr 15;103(8):1644-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20956.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain.苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗作为西班牙滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线治疗方案的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab combined with chop for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
Value Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;8(4):462-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00037.x.
5
[Economic analysis of rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone in the treatment of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma in Portugal].[利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松龙治疗葡萄牙晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的经济学分析]
Acta Med Port. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):1025-34. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
6
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.利妥昔单抗作为 III-IV 期滤泡性淋巴瘤的一线治疗药物(对技术评估第 110 号的回顾):一项系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(37):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16370.
7
Cost-effectiveness of maintenance rituximab treatment after second line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma in Sweden.瑞典滤泡性淋巴瘤患者二线治疗后利妥昔单抗维持治疗的成本效益
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1080/02841860802120028.
8
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III/IV follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.利妥昔单抗用于Ⅲ/Ⅳ期滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:23-8. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/04.
9
Final results of a randomized trial comparing 1, 3, or 6 infusions of Rituximab plus 6 cycles CHOP provide valuable preliminary data towards a more cost-effective and safer treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma.一项比较利妥昔单抗1次、3次或6次输注联合6个周期CHOP方案的随机试验的最终结果,为更具成本效益和安全性的晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗提供了有价值的初步数据。
Am J Hematol. 2012 Oct;87(10):E68-71. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23286. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of rituximab to CHOP in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.在预后良好的年轻弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案的成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(1):55-65. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828010-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.伴随 inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 试验的成本效益分析:利妥昔单抗治疗儿童和青少年 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):307-317. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
2
PET-Based Staging Is Cost-Effective in Early-Stage Follicular Lymphoma.基于 PET 的分期在早期滤泡性淋巴瘤中具有成本效益。
J Nucl Med. 2022 Apr;63(4):543-548. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262324. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
3
Treatment Patterns and Health Care Costs in Commercially Insured Patients with Follicular Lymphoma.
商业保险覆盖的滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的治疗模式与医疗费用
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2020 Sep 4;7(2):148-157. doi: 10.36469/jheor.2020.16784. eCollection 2020.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses, Costs and Resource Use, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Systematic Reviews.滤泡性或边缘区淋巴瘤患者的成本效益分析、成本与资源利用以及健康相关生活质量:系统评价
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Dec;4(4):575-591. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00204-z.
5
A Generic Model for Follicular Lymphoma: Predicting Cost, Life Expectancy, and Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year Using UK Population-Based Observational Data.滤泡性淋巴瘤通用模型:利用英国基于人群的观测性数据预测成本、预期寿命和质量调整生命年。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1176-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
How should we assess the value of innovative drugs in oncology? Lessons from cost-effectiveness analyses.我们应如何评估肿瘤学创新药物的价值?成本效益分析的经验教训。
Blood. 2015 Oct 8;126(15):1860-1. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-657478. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Cost effectiveness of rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review.利妥昔单抗治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jul 1;30(7):537-49. doi: 10.2165/11591160-000000000-00000.
8
Mechanism-based approach to the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic/pharmacoeconomic analysis of rituximab for follicular lymphoma.基于机制的药物经济学评价方法:利妥昔单抗治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤的药代动力学/药效学/药物经济学分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 May;30(5):413-29. doi: 10.2165/11591540-000000000-00000.
9
Role of maintenance rituximab (rituxan) therapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma.美罗华维持治疗在滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗中的作用。
P T. 2011 Sep;36(9):590-8.
10
Rituximab in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, focus on outcomes and comparative effectiveness.利妥昔单抗治疗B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤,重点关注疗效和比较效果。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:37-45. doi: 10.2147/ceor.s4221. Epub 2010 Apr 7.