Suppr超能文献

苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗作为西班牙滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线治疗方案的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain.

作者信息

Sabater Eliazar, López-Guillermo Armando, Rueda Antonio, Salar Antonio, Oyagüez Itziar, Collar Juan Manuel

机构信息

Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4- letra I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain.

Haematology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab-bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab-bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness.

RESULTS

Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab-bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab-bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab-bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab-bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations.

CONCLUSION

First-line therapy with rituximab-bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.

摘要

背景

滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)是西欧第二常见的淋巴癌类型。

目的

本研究旨在评估在西班牙,与利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗相比,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗作为晚期FL患者一线治疗的成本效益。

方法

构建马尔可夫模型,以估计在西班牙国家卫生系统(NHS)中,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀与R-CHOP作为晚期FL患者一线治疗的成本效益。患者队列按4周周期在健康状态(无进展,包括诱导和维持;首次复发;第二次复发;死亡)之间转换。无进展生存曲线外推的临床数据来自随机试验。死亡率和效用值来自文献。结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量。总成本(欧元,2013年)包括药物成本(出厂价并扣除强制性费用)、疾病管理成本和不良事件相关成本。成本和结果按每年3%的贴现率贴现。使用10000次蒙特卡洛模拟进行概率敏感性分析,以评估模型的稳健性。

结果

利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀诱导期的治疗和给药成本(17671欧元)高于R-CHOP(11850欧元)。在25年期末,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀一线治疗策略的总成本为68357欧元,而R-CHOP为69528欧元。利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗的健康效益(10.31 QALY)高于R-CHOP治疗(9.82 QALY)。在概率分析中,53.4%的模拟显示利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀是优于R-CHOP治疗的确切策略。

结论

对于FL患者,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀一线治疗是优于R-CHOP治疗的确切策略;对西班牙NHS而言,它节省了成本并带来了更高的健康效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验