Sabater Eliazar, López-Guillermo Armando, Rueda Antonio, Salar Antonio, Oyagüez Itziar, Collar Juan Manuel
Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4- letra I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain.
Haematology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab-bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain.
A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab-bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness.
Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab-bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab-bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab-bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab-bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations.
First-line therapy with rituximab-bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.
滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)是西欧第二常见的淋巴癌类型。
本研究旨在评估在西班牙,与利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗相比,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗作为晚期FL患者一线治疗的成本效益。
构建马尔可夫模型,以估计在西班牙国家卫生系统(NHS)中,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀与R-CHOP作为晚期FL患者一线治疗的成本效益。患者队列按4周周期在健康状态(无进展,包括诱导和维持;首次复发;第二次复发;死亡)之间转换。无进展生存曲线外推的临床数据来自随机试验。死亡率和效用值来自文献。结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量。总成本(欧元,2013年)包括药物成本(出厂价并扣除强制性费用)、疾病管理成本和不良事件相关成本。成本和结果按每年3%的贴现率贴现。使用10000次蒙特卡洛模拟进行概率敏感性分析,以评估模型的稳健性。
利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀诱导期的治疗和给药成本(17671欧元)高于R-CHOP(11850欧元)。在25年期末,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀一线治疗策略的总成本为68357欧元,而R-CHOP为69528欧元。利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗的健康效益(10.31 QALY)高于R-CHOP治疗(9.82 QALY)。在概率分析中,53.4%的模拟显示利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀是优于R-CHOP治疗的确切策略。
对于FL患者,利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀一线治疗是优于R-CHOP治疗的确切策略;对西班牙NHS而言,它节省了成本并带来了更高的健康效益。