• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤护理中的脓毒症:发病率与转归

Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.

作者信息

Tedesco Diana Julia, Hutter Maria Fernanda, Khalaf Fadi, Ricciuti Zachary, Jeschke Marc G

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Centre for Burn Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.

出版信息

Mil Med Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00643-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40779-025-00643-x
PMID:40890875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although sepsis is known to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adult burn patients, its epidemiology and impact are poorly understood. This study aims to address these gaps by further characterizing predictors of sepsis and comparing outcomes between septic and non-septic burn patients in different age groups.

METHODS

We included patients (≥ 18 years) with thermal burn injuries ≥ 5% total body surface area (TBSA) admitted to two burn centers between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2021, and 1 January 2023 and 6 April 2025. Patients were stratified by age into adults (18-59 years) and older adults (≥ 60 years), and by diagnosis of sepsis during hospitalization (sepsis vs. control). Demographics, injury characteristics, mortality, and in-hospital complications were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of sepsis and mortality among septic patients.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 1465 patients, including 1094 adults and 371 older adults. Sepsis was diagnosed in 20.1% of adult burn patients, with a median onset at 10 d following injury. Increasing age, greater TBSA, and inhalation injury were identified as significant risk factors for sepsis. Among patients who developed sepsis, earlier onset and female sex were associated with an elevated risk of mortality. In older adults, the incidence of sepsis was 22.9%, with a median onset at 11 d post-burn. The odds of sepsis diagnosis increased with higher TBSA and the presence of inhalation injury. Earlier sepsis onset was associated with increased mortality in older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis represents a significant clinical challenge in burn patients, with age, TBSA, inhalation injury, and comorbidities significantly influencing its incidence and outcomes. Notably, early sepsis onset and female sex are associated with increased mortality, highlighting the need for advanced monitoring, prompt interventions, and the exploration of innovative sex-specific strategies to optimize outcomes in this high-risk population.

摘要

背景

尽管脓毒症是成年烧伤患者发病和死亡的主要原因,但其流行病学和影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在通过进一步描述脓毒症的预测因素,并比较不同年龄组脓毒症烧伤患者和非脓毒症烧伤患者的结局,来填补这些空白。

方法

我们纳入了2006年1月1日至2021年6月30日以及2023年1月1日至2025年4月6日期间入住两个烧伤中心的热烧伤患者(≥18岁),其烧伤面积≥5%体表面积(TBSA)。患者按年龄分为成年人(18 - 59岁)和老年人(≥60岁),并根据住院期间脓毒症诊断情况(脓毒症组与对照组)进行分层。评估了人口统计学、损伤特征、死亡率和住院并发症。采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定脓毒症患者中脓毒症和死亡的预测因素。

结果

本研究共纳入1465例患者,其中成年人1094例,老年人371例。20.1%的成年烧伤患者被诊断为脓毒症,中位发病时间为受伤后10天。年龄增加、TBSA增大和吸入性损伤被确定为脓毒症的重要危险因素。在发生脓毒症的患者中,发病较早和女性与死亡风险升高相关。在老年人中,脓毒症发病率为22.9%,中位发病时间为烧伤后11天。脓毒症诊断的几率随TBSA升高和存在吸入性损伤而增加。脓毒症发病较早与老年人死亡率增加相关。

结论

脓毒症是烧伤患者面临的重大临床挑战,年龄、TBSA、吸入性损伤和合并症显著影响其发病率和结局。值得注意的是,脓毒症早期发病和女性与死亡率增加相关,这凸显了在这一高危人群中进行高级监测、及时干预以及探索创新性性别特异性策略以优化结局的必要性。

相似文献

1
Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.烧伤护理中的脓毒症:发病率与转归
Mil Med Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00643-x.
2
Insight on Pediatric Burn Morbidity and Mortality at a Tertiary Indian Burn Care Center: A Case for Burn Prevention.印度一家三级烧伤护理中心对儿童烧伤发病率和死亡率的洞察:预防烧伤的必要性
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Jan 24;46(1):117-122. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae091.
3
Exploring infection risk factors and multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in burn intensive care units: a multi-centre case-control study.探索烧伤重症监护病房的感染危险因素和多重耐药菌(MDROs):一项多中心病例对照研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2025 May 31;162:186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.010.
4
Does trauma center designation impact management, complications, and outcomes in burn patients? A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.创伤中心指定是否会影响烧伤患者的管理、并发症及治疗结果?一项国家创伤数据库分析。
Burns. 2025 Sep;51(7):107588. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107588. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
5
Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome and sepsis in pediatric burns.小儿烧伤中的持续炎症、免疫抑制、分解代谢综合征与脓毒症
Burns. 2025 Aug;51(6):107571. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107571. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
6
Who By Fire? Sepsis in the Adult Burn Patient: Prognostic Factors.谁将葬身火海?成年烧伤患者的脓毒症:预后因素。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2025 Aug;27(8):487-491.
7
Incidence and delirium risk factors in burn patients: A prospective cohort study.烧伤患者的发病率及谵妄危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Burns. 2025 Aug;51(6):107556. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107556. Epub 2025 May 21.
8
Results of microbiological surveillance in patients with high-voltage eletrical injuries: A 10-year single center experience.高压电损伤患者微生物学监测结果:一项为期10年的单中心经验。
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2025;74(2):97-106. doi: 10.61568/emi/11-6492/20250428/140415.
9
Development and validation of web-based, interpretable predictive models for sepsis and mortality in extensive burns.广泛烧伤患者脓毒症和死亡率的基于网络的可解释性预测模型的开发与验证
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Aug 18;15:1586087. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1586087. eCollection 2025.
10
Early coagulation changes as predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with severe burn and inhalation injuries.早期凝血变化作为严重烧伤和吸入性损伤患者不良结局的预测指标。
Burns. 2025 Mar;51(2):107373. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107373. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex- and Age-Related Differences in Post-Burn Pathophysiology.烧伤后病理生理学中的性别和年龄差异。
Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006789.
2
Sex differences in the time trends of sepsis biomarkers following polytrauma.多发伤后脓毒症生物标志物时间趋势的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 18;15(1):2398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86495-w.
3
Decoding burn trauma: biomarkers for early diagnosis of burn-induced pathologies.解读烧伤创伤:烧伤所致病症早期诊断的生物标志物
Biomark Res. 2024 Dec 23;12(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00707-5.
4
Epidemiology and timing of infectious complications from battlefield-related burn injuries.战场相关烧伤的感染并发症的流行病学及发生时间
Burns. 2024 Dec;50(9):107200. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Post-burn endocrine-immune dynamics and ageing considerations.烧伤后内分泌-免疫动力学及衰老相关考量
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Oct;20(10):567-568. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01018-3.
6
Clinical biomarker profiles reveals gender differences and mortality factors in sepsis.临床生物标志物谱揭示了脓毒症中的性别差异和死亡因素。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 21;15:1413729. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1413729. eCollection 2024.
7
KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.KDIGO 2024慢性肾脏病评估与管理临床实践指南
Kidney Int. 2024 Apr;105(4S):S117-S314. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018.
8
Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign.烧伤后脓毒症存活研究
Burns. 2023 Nov;49(7):1487-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 6.
9
Global Disparities in Burn Outcomes: Does Gender Predict Mortality in the Global Burn Registry?全球烧伤结局的差异:全球烧伤登记处的性别是否预测死亡率?
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:459-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.071. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
10
The Immune and Regenerative Response to Burn Injury.烧伤后的免疫与再生反应。
Cells. 2022 Sep 29;11(19):3073. doi: 10.3390/cells11193073.