Mouradian M M, Heuser I J, Baronti F, Giuffra M, Conant K, Davis T L, Chase T N
Experimental Therapeutics Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 May;54(5):401-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.5.401.
Direct acting dopamine agonists are generally less effective than levodopa in relieving symptoms of Parkinson's disease. In an attempt to quantitate and explain this situation, the acute motor responses to intravenous injections of the dopamine agonist, (-)-N-n-propyl-norapomorphine hydrochloride (NPA), were compared with those of the dopamine precursor, levodopa. At optimum dose levels, the acute anti-Parkinsonian efficacy of NPA averaged only about 50% of maximum, while essentially total symptom suppression was obtained with levodopa in patients previously treated with the amine precursor. Dyskinesia severity, however, was similar with the two drugs. These differences in anti-Parkinsonian efficacy may reflect the fact that while NPA acts mainly on D-2 dopamine receptors, levodopa results in stimulation of both the D-1 and D-2 subsets of receptors at a more physiological ratio. Future efforts to develop dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinsonian symptoms may thus have to consider focusing on drugs having pharmacological profile more similar to that of dopamine.
直接作用的多巴胺激动剂在缓解帕金森病症状方面通常不如左旋多巴有效。为了量化并解释这种情况,将静脉注射多巴胺激动剂(-)-N-正丙基去甲阿扑吗啡盐酸盐(NPA)的急性运动反应与多巴胺前体左旋多巴的急性运动反应进行了比较。在最佳剂量水平下,NPA的急性抗帕金森病疗效平均仅约为最大值的50%,而在先前用胺前体治疗的患者中,左旋多巴基本上能完全抑制症状。然而,两种药物导致的运动障碍严重程度相似。抗帕金森病疗效的这些差异可能反映了这样一个事实,即虽然NPA主要作用于D-2多巴胺受体,但左旋多巴会以更符合生理的比例刺激D-1和D-2受体亚型。因此,未来开发用于治疗帕金森病症状的多巴胺激动剂的努力可能不得不考虑专注于药理特性更类似于多巴胺的药物。