Kjøs Bente Ødegård, Botten Grete, Romøren Tor Inge
Center for Care Research, Gjøvik University College, PO Box 191, N-2802 Gjøvik, Norway.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Dec;20(6):433-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn031. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
To explore the extent to which quality improvement activities are implemented in the Norwegian long-term care system for older people, and to determine if variations in the extent and scope of quality improvement activities are associated with the characteristics of the first-line care leaders, the sector or the size of the municipality.
A cross-sectional telephone survey supplemented with information from public records and official municipal websites. Data were organized according to six total quality management components, and a sum score was developed to measure quality improvement. Variations in the extent of quality improvement activities were analysed using multivariate analysis.
Thirty-two Norwegian municipalities stratified according to region and population size.
Sixty-four first-line leaders in nursing homes and home-based care.
A sum score has been used as a measure of quality improvement activities.
The unit's quality improvement activities varied by quality improvement components and by municipality. The technical component that requires training in tools and techniques was low; the general components as 'leader's involvement' and 'employee participation' were more common. The size of the populations of the municipalities showed a significant independent association with the scope of quality activities.
The six quality improvement components varied from high to extremely low, and the large municipalities had more quality activities than small- or medium-sized municipalities.
探讨挪威老年人长期护理系统中质量改进活动的实施程度,并确定质量改进活动的程度和范围差异是否与一线护理领导者的特征、部门或市政规模相关。
一项横断面电话调查,并辅以公共记录和市政官方网站的信息。数据根据六个全面质量管理组件进行整理,并制定了一个总分来衡量质量改进。使用多变量分析来分析质量改进活动程度的差异。
根据地区和人口规模对32个挪威市政进行分层。
养老院和居家护理的64名一线领导者。
使用总分作为质量改进活动的衡量指标。
各单位的质量改进活动因质量改进组件和市政而异。需要工具和技术培训的技术组件得分较低;“领导者参与”和“员工参与”等一般组件更为常见。市政人口规模与质量活动范围存在显著的独立关联。
六个质量改进组件的得分从高到极低各不相同,大城市的质量活动比中小城市更多。