Suppr超能文献

预先指示中列出特定医疗干预措施的局限性。

Limitations of listing specific medical interventions in advance directives.

作者信息

Brett A S

机构信息

Program in Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Aug 14;266(6):825-8.

PMID:1865521
Abstract

Recent events, including the Cruzan decision and the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act, have renewed interest in the strengths and limitations of various types of advance directives. In one well-known approach, the competent person indicates preferences for or against a series of specific medical interventions that might be considered if the person loses decision-making capacity. However, such lists of interventions may shift attention away from overall treatment goals or may prescribe inappropriate medical care. Moreover, listing specific interventions in advance does not necessarily enhance self-determination or reduce uncertainty in decision making.

摘要

近期发生的一些事件,包括“克鲁赞案”的判决以及《患者自我决定法案》的通过,重新引发了人们对各类预先指示的优势与局限性的关注。在一种广为人知的方式中,具备行为能力的人表明其对一系列特定医疗干预措施支持或反对的偏好,这些措施可能在其丧失决策能力时被考虑采用。然而,此类干预措施清单可能会使人们的注意力从总体治疗目标上转移,或者规定不恰当的医疗护理。此外,预先列出具体的干预措施并不一定会增强自我决定权,也不一定能减少决策中的不确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验