Suppr超能文献

放弃提供目标一致的护理的目标:预先护理计划以改善护理人员的结果。

Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):3006-3011. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18000. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

Abstract

The merits and effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP) continue to be debated a full 30 years after the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act. This act gave patients the right to create advance directives, with the objective of ensuring that the care they received at the end of life was consistent with their preferences and goals. ACP has definitively moved beyond the completion of advance directives to encompass the identification of a healthcare agent and the facilitation of communication among patients, surrogates, and clinicians. Nonetheless, the provision of goal-concordant care remains a primary objective for ACP. This article argues that this cannot and should not be the objective for ACP. Patients' goals change, and the provision of goal-concordant care is sometimes incompatible with other critical determinants of appropriate care. Instead, ACP should focus on the objective of improving caregiver outcomes. Surrogate decision-making by caregivers is associated with an elevated risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and other adverse outcomes, and these outcomes can be improved with ACP. ACP focused on caregivers involves helping caregivers to understand how they can help to shape the final chapter in a patient's life story, preventing caregivers from making promises they cannot keep, and preparing them to use all relevant information at the time decisions need to be made.

摘要

在《患者自决法案》通过整整 30 年后,关于预先护理计划(ACP)的优点和效果仍存在争议。该法案赋予了患者制定预先指示的权利,其目的是确保患者在生命末期得到的护理符合他们的偏好和目标。ACP 已经超越了完成预先指示的范畴,涵盖了医疗代理人的指定以及促进患者、代理人和临床医生之间的沟通。尽管如此,提供与目标一致的护理仍然是 ACP 的主要目标。本文认为,这不能也不应该成为 ACP 的目标。患者的目标会发生变化,而提供与目标一致的护理有时与其他适当护理的关键决定因素不相容。相反,ACP 应该侧重于改善护理人员的结果。护理人员的代理决策与创伤后应激障碍和其他不良后果的风险增加有关,而通过 ACP 可以改善这些结果。以护理人员为重点的 ACP 涉及帮助护理人员了解他们如何帮助塑造患者生命故事的最后一章,防止护理人员做出无法兑现的承诺,并在需要做出决策时为他们准备好使用所有相关信息。

相似文献

3
A systematic evaluation of advance care planning patient educational resources.系统评价预先医疗照护计划患者教育资源。
Geriatr Nurs. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

7
Optimizing Care Planning for Older Adults in Primary Care.优化基层医疗中老年人的护理计划
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):171-172. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6370.
8
Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure.呼吸衰竭患者的预先医疗照护计划。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Nov 13;33(174). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0120-2024. Print 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

2
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
5
Complicated Grief: Risk Factors, Protective Factors, and Interventions.复杂性哀伤:风险因素、保护因素和干预措施。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2020 Apr-Jun;16(2):151-174. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2020.1745726. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验