Anzalone Nicoletta, Scotti Roberta, Vezzulli Paolo
Department of Neuroradiology, Scientific Institute S. Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60 20132 Milan, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2006 Nov;16 Suppl 7:M27-34. doi: 10.1007/s10406-006-0193-2.
Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is one of the most practical diagnostic imaging modalities in the field of neurovascular imaging where risks associated with catheter angiography are high. Evaluation of the extracranial supraortic vessels, and in particular the carotid arteries, is the major field of application for MRA. Before the development of rapid contrast-enhanced (CE) acquisition sequences, the major limitations of MRA pertaining to the carotid arteries was the limited volume of study when 3D time-of-flight (TOF) images were acquired, and the saturation effects together with low spatial resolution and movement artifacts when 2D TOF images were acquired. Although technical improvements helped overcome some of these limitations, MRA was still not considered a valid diagnostic alternative to DSA for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis until the advent of CE acquisitions. Most published studies on CE-MRA of the carotid arteries have been performed with standard gadolinium-based chelates which have similar r1 relaxivity values. Newer gadolinium chelates such as gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance, Gd-BOPTA, Bracco) have higher intravascular r1 relaxivity than other agents such as Gd-DTPA. This leads to higher vascular peak enhancement of longer duration which has proven beneficial for improving vascular contrast. CE-MRA is today considered a highly suitable replacement for conventional MRA techniques and DSA for the evaluation of extracranial carotid artery disease. Compared with unenhanced MRA sequences, CE-MRA permits complete and reliable evaluation of the internal carotid artery from the bifurcation to the intracranial segment. Moreover, the technique offers better overall accuracy for the depiction of tight stenosis and more confident diagnosis of real carotid occlusion versus subocclusive stenosis.
磁共振血管造影(MRA)是神经血管成像领域中最实用的诊断成像方式之一,在该领域中,与导管血管造影相关的风险较高。颅外主动脉血管,尤其是颈动脉的评估,是MRA的主要应用领域。在快速对比增强(CE)采集序列发展之前,MRA在颈动脉方面的主要局限性在于,采集三维时间飞跃(TOF)图像时研究范围有限,而采集二维TOF图像时存在饱和效应、空间分辨率低和运动伪影。尽管技术改进有助于克服其中一些局限性,但在CE采集技术出现之前,MRA仍未被视为评估颈动脉狭窄的有效诊断替代方法,可替代数字减影血管造影(DSA)。大多数已发表的关于颈动脉CE-MRA的研究都是使用具有相似r1弛豫率值的标准钆基螯合物进行的。新型钆螯合物,如钆贝葡胺(Multihance,Gd-BOPTA,博莱科公司),比其他试剂如钆喷酸葡胺具有更高的血管内r1弛豫率。这导致更高的血管峰值增强且持续时间更长,这已被证明有利于改善血管对比度。如今,CE-MRA被认为是评估颅外颈动脉疾病的传统MRA技术和DSA的非常合适的替代方法。与非增强MRA序列相比,CE-MRA能够从分叉处到颅内段对颈内动脉进行完整且可靠的评估。此外,该技术在描绘严重狭窄方面具有更好的总体准确性,并且在诊断真正的颈动脉闭塞与亚闭塞性狭窄方面更具信心。