Kermani Omid, Oberheide Uwe
Augenklinik am Neumarkt, Cologne, Germany.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.037.
To assess flap creation and stromal bed quality of 2 femtosecond refractive surgery lasers in laser in situ keratomileusis.
Augenklinik am Neumarkt, Cologne, Germany.
Corneal flaps were created in 115 freshly enucleated porcine eyes using the 60 kHz IntraLase FS laser (Advanced Medical Optics) and a prototype model of the Femto LDV femtosecond laser (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). The parameters that were evaluated included actual versus intended thickness by subtraction pachymetry, cutting and total suction time, quality of flap edges, and smoothness of flap beds. Confocal microscopy (Atos PLmu [Altos GmbH]) was used to objectively determine the root mean square (RMS) of the surface roughness of the stromal bed.
Cutting time was 31 seconds for the 60 kHz IntraLase FS laser and 38 seconds for the Femto LDV laser. With both lasers, the standard deviation in achieved versus intended flap thickness was small (136 microm +/- 10 and 130 +/- 9 microm, respectively). Under micromorphologic examination, stromal bed quality was slightly better with the IntraLase. The RMS of bed roughness was 1.6 +/- 0.5 microm with the IntraLase and 2.0 +/- 0.4 microm with the Femto LDV. Neither laser showed significant thermal or mechanical damage in adjacent tissue layers of the stromal bed. The laser-induced bubble layer was more pronounced with the IntraLase.
The laser cuts of the IntraLase FS and Femto LDV femtosecond lasers were equally smooth and of excellent quality. The standard deviation of the flap thickness was small and equal in both systems.
评估两种飞秒屈光手术激光在准分子原位角膜磨镶术中制作角膜瓣及基质床质量。
德国科隆新市场眼科诊所。
使用60kHz IntraLase FS激光(先进医疗光学公司)和飞秒LDV飞秒激光原型机(齐默眼科系统股份公司)在115只新鲜摘除的猪眼中制作角膜瓣。评估的参数包括通过减法测厚法得出的实际厚度与预期厚度、切割和总吸引时间、瓣边缘质量以及瓣床平滑度。共聚焦显微镜(Atos PLmu [阿尔托斯有限公司])用于客观测定基质床表面粗糙度的均方根(RMS)。
60kHz IntraLase FS激光的切割时间为31秒,飞秒LDV激光为38秒。两种激光的实际瓣厚度与预期瓣厚度的标准差均较小(分别为136微米±10微米和130±9微米)。在微观形态学检查中,IntraLase激光的基质床质量略好。IntraLase激光的床粗糙度RMS为1.6±0.5微米,飞秒LDV激光为2.0±0.4微米。两种激光在基质床相邻组织层均未显示明显的热损伤或机械损伤。IntraLase激光诱导的气泡层更明显。
IntraLase FS和飞秒LDV飞秒激光的激光切割同样平滑且质量优异。两种系统中瓣厚度的标准差均较小且相等。