Chavan Prithviraj R, Duquin Thomas R, Bisson Leslie J
University of Buffalo, Sports Medicine, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1618-24. doi: 10.1177/0363546508321482.
Reinsertion of the acutely ruptured distal biceps is the preferred method of treatment for most patients and is designed to restore flexion and supination strength. It is not clear which, if any, method of fixation is superior or whether a 2-incision or single-incision approach is associated with fewer complications or better outcomes.
(1) There is no difference in biomechanical performance between currently used fixation methods, (2) there is no difference in incidence of complications between the 2-incision and single-incision approach, and (3) there is no difference in clinical outcomes between the 2-incision and single-incision approach.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
The authors performed a systematic review of the literature studying treatment of the ruptured distal biceps tendon to determine optimal fixation method as well as surgical approach with lowest incidence of complications and highest proportion of satisfactory results.
The review identified 8 articles that had relevant biomechanical data, 23 with relevant complication data, and 19 with relevant clinical results data. EndoButton fixation performed best in comparative biomechanical studies. There was no difference in overall incidence of complications between 2-incision approaches (16%) and single-incision approaches (18%), but there were significantly more instances of significant loss of forearm rotation with the 2-incision approach. There were significantly more unsatisfactory clinical results in the 2-incision repair group (31% vs 6%; odds ratio, 7.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-17.7), with the majority of unsatisfactory results in the 2-incision group due to loss of forearm rotation or rotational strength.
EndoButton fixation has the highest load and stiffness of currently available fixation methods. Two-incision repairs have a significantly greater proportion of unsatisfactory results than do single-incision repairs.
急性肱二头肌远端断裂后重新植入是大多数患者首选的治疗方法,旨在恢复屈曲和旋后力量。目前尚不清楚哪种固定方法(如果有的话)更优,或者双切口或单切口入路是否与更少的并发症或更好的结果相关。
(1)目前使用的固定方法在生物力学性能上没有差异;(2)双切口和单切口入路在并发症发生率上没有差异;(3)双切口和单切口入路在临床结果上没有差异。
系统评价;证据等级,4级。
作者对研究肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂治疗的文献进行了系统评价,以确定最佳固定方法以及并发症发生率最低且满意结果比例最高的手术入路。
该评价确定了8篇有相关生物力学数据的文章、23篇有相关并发症数据的文章和19篇有相关临床结果数据的文章。在比较生物力学研究中,EndoButton固定效果最佳。双切口入路(16%)和单切口入路(18%)的总体并发症发生率没有差异,但双切口入路导致前臂旋转明显丧失的情况更多。双切口修复组的不满意临床结果明显更多(31%对6%;优势比,7.6;95%置信区间,3.2 - 17.7),双切口组大多数不满意结果是由于前臂旋转或旋转力量丧失。
EndoButton固定在目前可用的固定方法中具有最高的负荷和刚度。双切口修复的不满意结果比例明显高于单切口修复。