Hochberger Felix, Hess Julian, Konrads Christian, Heinz Tizian, Segatz Ella, Rudert Maximilian, List Kilian
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hanseatic Hospital Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.
JSES Int. 2025 Apr 8;9(4):1400-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal biceps tendon ruptures undergoing surgical fixation using 2 intramedullary all-suture anchors (ASAs) and to compare these outcomes with a control group treated with 2 intramedullary titanium anchors (TAs).
A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent distal biceps tendon fixation using either TAs (Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, MA, USA) or ASAs (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, and visual analog scale. Secondary assessments included isometric strength testing with the IsoForce Control Dynamometer (IsoForce, Dübendorf, Switzerland) and the identification of postoperative complications, such as heterotopic ossification (HO).
A total of 53 patients (23 ASA, 30 TA) were included in the final analysis, with ASA patients being slightly younger (55.2 ± 9.8 years vs. 63.2 ± 7.7 years, < .05) and the only group to include females (4), as the TA cohort comprised exclusively male patients. The average follow-up duration was 33.8 ± 9.3 months for the ASA group and 45.4 ± 11.1 months for the TA group. HOs were significantly more prevalent in the TA group (37.5% vs. 17.2%, < .05). Functional outcomes, measured by Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH, and strength recovery ratios were comparable across both groups, though ASA patients demonstrated higher absolute isometric strength values at specific flexion angles ( < .05). Both anchor systems delivered equivalent functional and clinical outcomes after 1 year postoperatively.
Both, ASAs and TAs, achieved excellent functional and clinical outcomes in distal biceps tendon fixation with low complication rates. ASA demonstrated significant fewer HOs compared to TA.
本研究的目的是评估使用2枚髓内全缝线锚钉(ASA)对肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂患者进行手术固定后的初步临床和功能结果,并将这些结果与使用2枚髓内钛锚钉(TA)治疗的对照组进行比较。
对使用TA(美国马萨诸塞州雷纳姆市Mitek运动医学公司)或ASA(美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯市Arthrex公司)进行肱二头肌远端肌腱固定的患者进行回顾性病例系列研究。在平均24个月的随访中,使用梅奥肘关节功能评分、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷以及视觉模拟量表评估临床和功能结果。二级评估包括使用IsoForce控制测力计(瑞士迪本多夫市IsoForce公司)进行等长力量测试以及识别术后并发症,如异位骨化(HO)。
最终分析共纳入53例患者(23例使用ASA,30例使用TA),使用ASA的患者年龄稍小(55.2±9.8岁对63.2±7.7岁,P<0.05),且是唯一纳入女性患者的组(4例),而使用TA的队列仅包括男性患者。ASA组的平均随访时间为33.8±9.3个月,TA组为45.4±11.1个月。HO在TA组中明显更常见(37.5%对17.2%,P<0.05)。通过梅奥肘关节功能评分和QuickDASH测量的功能结果以及力量恢复率在两组中相当,尽管使用ASA的患者在特定屈曲角度下表现出更高的绝对等长力量值(P<0.05)。两种锚钉系统在术后1年时均产生了相当的功能和临床结果。
ASA和TA在肱二头肌远端肌腱固定中均取得了优异的功能和临床结果,并发症发生率低。与TA相比,ASA的HO明显更少。