Brass Marcel, Haggard Patrick
Ghent University, Department of Experimental Psychology and Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, Ghent, Belgium.
Neuroscientist. 2008 Aug;14(4):319-25. doi: 10.1177/1073858408317417.
The question of how we can intentionally control our behavior has an enduring fascination for philosophers, psychologists, and neurologists. Brain imaging techniques such as functional MRI have recently provided new insights into the functional and brain mechanisms involved in intentional action. However, the literature is rather contradictory and does not reveal a consistent picture of the functional neuroanatomy of intentional action. Here the authors argue that this confusion arises partly because intentional action has been treated as a unitary concept within neuroscience, even though experimental studies may focus on any of a number of different aspects of intentional action. To provide a heuristic framework for the investigation of intentional action, the authors propose a model that distinguishes three major components: a component related to the decision about which action to execute (what component), a component that is related to the decision about when to execute an action (when component), and finally the decision about whether to execute an action or not (whether component). Based on this distinction, the authors review some key findings on intentional action and provide neuroscientific evidence for the What, When, Whether (WWW) model of intentional action.
我们如何能够有意识地控制自己的行为这一问题,一直以来都令哲学家、心理学家和神经学家着迷。诸如功能磁共振成像等脑成像技术,最近为有意行动所涉及的功能和脑机制提供了新的见解。然而,相关文献相当矛盾,并未揭示出有意行动功能神经解剖学的一致图景。作者们认为,这种混乱部分源于在神经科学领域,有意行动一直被视为一个单一的概念,尽管实验研究可能聚焦于有意行动的诸多不同方面中的任何一个。为了给有意行动的研究提供一个启发式框架,作者们提出了一个模型,该模型区分了三个主要成分:一个与决定执行何种行动相关的成分(“什么”成分),一个与决定何时执行行动相关的成分(“何时”成分),以及最后一个关于是否执行行动的决定(“是否”成分)。基于这一区分,作者们回顾了一些关于有意行动的关键发现,并为有意行动的“什么、何时、是否”(WWW)模型提供了神经科学证据。