Schlosser Ralf W, Wendt Oliver
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Northeastern University, 151B Forsyth, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):212-30. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021).
This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified.
A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes.
Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest.
Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.
本系统评价旨在确定辅助与替代性沟通(AAC)干预对自闭症或未特定的广泛性发育障碍儿童言语产生的影响。
采用系统评价方法以限制在检索、选择、编码和综合相关治疗研究中的偏倚。这涉及多方面检索1975年至2007年5月间撰写的研究,使用各种书目数据库、学位论文数据库,手工检索选定期刊以及已发表的AAC论文和学位论文汇编,并进行追溯检索。要纳入研究,必须符合严格标准。一本编码手册和表格便于从参与者特征、治疗特征、设计与测量以及结果方面提取数据。
纳入了9项单病例实验设计(27名参与者)和2项群组研究(98名参与者)。结果表明,AAC干预不会妨碍言语产生。事实上,大多数研究报告言语产生有所增加。然而,深入分析显示这种增加相当有限。
尽管AAC干预似乎不会妨碍言语产生,且可能导致言语产生增加,但观察到的有限增加要求临床医生和其他利益相关者保持现实期望。未来研究应以假设驱动为主,旨在识别预测性儿童特征,如先前的言语模仿和物体探索技能。