Garrafa Volnei, Porto Dora
University of Brasília, Brazil.
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):87-102, 197. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0087.
Principlism, which originated in the United States based on four supposedly universal principles, brought international visibility to the field of bioethics over the final years of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, from 1990 onwards, criticism regarding the universal applicability of these principles emerged, especially concerning their limitations in dealing with collective macroproblems--social, sanitary and environmental--that are seen in poor developing countries every day. In this respect, the idea of Intervention Bioethics was presented at the University of Brasília, Brazil, in 1998, and was subsequently expanded to encompass other Latin American countries. From the outset, this epistemological proposal of third-world construction and perspective advocated politicisation of the international bioethics agenda, and this aim was achieved through the content of UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which was adopted in 2005. Grounded in a utilitarian and consequentialistic approach, Intervention Bioethics gives priority, ahead of vulnerabilities relating to gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and similar considerations, to the fields of social and sanitary justice in order to defend the poorest and most disempowered populations in the asymmetrical contemporary world.
原则主义起源于美国,基于四条所谓的普遍原则,在20世纪最后几年使生物伦理学领域在国际上受到关注。然而,从1990年起,对这些原则普遍适用性的批评出现了,尤其是关于它们在处理集体宏观问题(社会、卫生和环境问题)时的局限性,这些问题在贫困的发展中国家每天都能看到。在这方面,干预生物伦理学的理念于1998年在巴西巴西利亚大学提出,随后扩展到其他拉丁美洲国家。从一开始,这种第三世界建构和视角的认识论提议就主张将国际生物伦理学议程政治化,这一目标通过2005年通过的联合国教科文组织《生物伦理学和人权普遍宣言》的内容得以实现。干预生物伦理学以功利主义和结果主义方法为基础,在涉及性别、性取向、种族等相关脆弱性问题之前,优先考虑社会和卫生正义领域,以保护当代不对称世界中最贫困和最无权势的人群。