Suppr超能文献

多发性神经病中的临床及肌电图检查的腱反射:诊断价值及患病率*

Clinical and electromyographic deep tendon reflexes in polyneuropathy: diagnostic value and prevalence*.

作者信息

Sharma K R, Saadia D, Facca A G, Resnick S, Ayyar D R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33136, USA.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2009 Apr;119(4):224-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01078.x. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence is accumulating that patients with polyneuropathy may present with normal clinical deep tendon reflexes (C-DTR). There are few studies that assessed the diagnostic utility of electromyographically recorded DTR (Er-DTR) in patients with polyneuropathy.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were twofold: (i) to evaluate the prevalence of preserved C-DTR in polyneuropathy; (ii) diagnostic value of Er-DTR latency measurement in patients with polyneuropathy.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 38 controls and 185 patients with polyneuropathy. All subjects had evaluation of C-DTR, Er-DTR obtained from right biceps brachii (BR), right patellar (PR) and bilateral ankle reflexes (AR).

RESULTS

Of these 185 patients, 118 (63.8%) had chronic axonal neuropathy (CAN), 49 (26.5%) demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (DPN) and 18 (9.7%) small fiber neuropathy (SFN). The C-DTR were normal in 65 patients whereas 39 of these 65 (60%) patients had abnormalities of Er-DTR at one or more sites. Er-DTR latencies in patients with polyneuropathies were prolonged at all sites compared with controls (P < 0.01). Among patients with various types of polyneuropathies the Er-DTR, mean latencies at all the sites and latency indicative of demyelination (>150% of the normal mean) were higher in patients with DPN than that of CAN or SFN (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that C-DTR are preserved in 35.1% of the patients with polyneuropathies and Er-DTR should be performed in such patients in order to provide electrophysiological evidence of a polyneuropathy. Er-DTR are useful in distinguishing axonal from demyelinating disorders of peripheral nerve, and detection of subclinical involvement of large fibers in SFN.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,患有多发性神经病的患者临床深腱反射(C-DTR)可能正常。很少有研究评估肌电图记录的DTR(Er-DTR)在多发性神经病患者中的诊断效用。

目的

本研究的目的有两个:(i)评估多发性神经病中保留C-DTR的患病率;(ii)评估Er-DTR潜伏期测量在多发性神经病患者中的诊断价值。

方法

我们前瞻性地研究了38名对照者和185名多发性神经病患者。所有受试者均接受了C-DTR评估,以及从右肱二头肌(BR)、右髌骨(PR)和双侧跟腱反射(AR)获得的Er-DTR评估。

结果

在这185名患者中,118名(63.8%)患有慢性轴索性神经病(CAN),49名(26.5%)患有脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(DPN),18名(9.7%)患有小纤维神经病(SFN)。65名患者的C-DTR正常,而这65名患者中有39名(60%)在一个或多个部位存在Er-DTR异常。与对照组相比,多发性神经病患者所有部位的Er-DTR潜伏期均延长(P<0.01)。在各种类型的多发性神经病患者中,DPN患者所有部位的Er-DTR平均潜伏期以及提示脱髓鞘的潜伏期(>正常平均值的150%)均高于CAN或SFN患者(P<0.01)。

结论

我们得出结论,35.1%的多发性神经病患者C-DTR正常,对于此类患者应进行Er-DTR检查,以提供多发性神经病的电生理证据。Er-DTR有助于区分周围神经的轴索性疾病和脱髓鞘性疾病,以及检测SFN中大纤维的亚临床受累情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验