Hogue Aaron, Henderson Craig E, Dauber Sarah, Barajas Priscilla C, Fried Adam, Liddle Howard A
Health and Treatment Research, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 633 Third Avenue, 19th floor, New York, NY 10017, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):544-55. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.544.
This study examined the impact of treatment adherence and therapist competence on treatment outcome in a controlled trial of individual cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and multidimensional family therapy (MDFT) for adolescent substance use and related behavior problems. Participants included 136 adolescents (62 CBT, 74 MDFT) assessed at intake, discharge, and 6-month follow-up. Observational ratings of adherence and competence were collected on early and later phases of treatment (192 CBT sessions, 245 MDFT sessions) by using a contextual measure of treatment fidelity. Adherence and competence effects were tested after controlling for therapeutic alliance. In CBT only, stronger adherence predicted greater declines in drug use (linear effect). In CBT and MDFT, (a) stronger adherence predicted greater reductions in externalizing behaviors (linear effect) and (b) intermediate levels of adherence predicted the largest declines in internalizing behaviors, with high and low adherence predicting smaller improvements (curvilinear effect). Therapist competence did not predict outcome and did not moderate adherence-outcome relations; however, competence findings are tentative due to relatively low interrater reliability for the competence ratings. Clinical and research implications for attending to both linear and curvilinear adherence effects in manualized treatments for behavior disorders are discussed.
本研究在一项针对青少年物质使用及相关行为问题的个体认知行为疗法(CBT)和多维家庭疗法(MDFT)对照试验中,考察了治疗依从性和治疗师能力对治疗结果的影响。研究对象包括136名青少年(62名接受CBT,74名接受MDFT),在治疗开始、结束及6个月随访时进行评估。通过使用治疗保真度的情境测量方法,在治疗的早期和后期阶段(192次CBT治疗、245次MDFT治疗)收集对依从性和能力的观察评分。在控制治疗联盟因素后,对依从性和能力的影响进行了测试。仅在CBT治疗中,更强的依从性预示着药物使用量有更大幅度的下降(线性效应)。在CBT和MDFT治疗中,(a)更强的依从性预示着外化行为有更大程度的减少(线性效应),且(b)中等水平的依从性预示着内化行为下降幅度最大,高依从性和低依从性预示着改善程度较小(曲线效应)。治疗师能力并未预测治疗结果,也未调节依从性与治疗结果的关系;然而,由于能力评分的评分者间信度相对较低,关于能力的研究结果具有一定的不确定性。本文讨论了在针对行为障碍的手册化治疗中关注线性和曲线依从性效应的临床及研究意义。