Proclemer Alessandro, Allocca Giuseppe, Gregori Dario, Bonanno Carlo, Ometto Renato, Fontanelli Alessandro, Mantovan Roberto, Crosato Martino, Calzolari Vittorio, Pavoni Daisy, Facchin Domenico, Rebellato Luca, Fioretti Paolo M
Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria and IRCAB Foundation, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Europace. 2008 Sep;10(9):1085-90. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun197. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
To compare clinical characteristics, procedure complexity, acute and long-term outcome of 'ablate and pace' (A&P) with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). So far, only few small studies have compared the two procedures.
We analysed retrospectively a cohort of symptomatic consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF. Group 1 included 100 patients treated with A&P and Group 2 included 144 patients treated with PVI. Group 1 patients were older (74 +/- 8 vs. 56 +/- 9 years; P < 0.0001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50 +/- 13% vs. 59 +/- 7%; P < 0.05), and a lower prevalence of paroxysmal AF (46% vs. 65%; P < 0.05). Acute success was not statistically different (98% vs. 92.3%, P = ns). Group 1 patients had shorter procedure time and lower radiation exposure with respect to Group 2 patients (70 +/- 15 vs. 204 +/- 58 min, and 8 +/- 4 vs. 57 +/- 22 min; P < 0.0001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 29 months (I, III quartile; 15, 40 months) vs. 25 months (I, III quartile; 8, 36 months) (P = ns), all the patients in Group 1 were free of symptomatic AF, while 113 patients (79%) of Group 2 were in stable sinus rhythm (P < 0.0001). Persistent or permanent AF has been documented in 58 patients (58%) of Group 1 vs. 11 (8%) of Group 2 (P < 0.0001).
In this series (i) patients treated with A&P and PVI for drug-refractory AF showed significant differences in clinical profile; (ii) A&P is a shorter and less complex procedure, but is associated with a higher rate of persistent AF; (iii) symptomatic recurrences of paroxysmal AF were more frequent in PVI group. Randomized studies appear necessary to identify the best strategy in selected cases.
比较“消融与起搏”(A&P)和肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗药物难治性心房颤动(AF)患者的临床特征、手术复杂性、急性和长期预后。到目前为止,仅有少数小型研究对这两种手术进行了比较。
我们对一组有症状的连续性药物难治性AF患者进行了回顾性分析。第1组包括100例接受A&P治疗的患者,第2组包括144例接受PVI治疗的患者。第1组患者年龄更大(74±8岁 vs. 56±9岁;P<0.0001),左心室射血分数更低(50±13% vs. 59±7%;P<0.05),阵发性AF的患病率更低(46% vs. 65%;P<0.05)。急性成功率无统计学差异(98% vs. 92.3%,P=无显著性差异)。与第2组患者相比,第1组患者的手术时间更短,辐射暴露更低(分别为70±15分钟 vs. 204±58分钟,以及8±4分钟 vs. 57±
22分钟;P<0.0001)。在分别进行了29个月(第一、三分位数;15、40个月)和25个月(第一、三分位数;8、36个月)的中位随访后(P=无显著性差异),第1组所有患者均无有症状的AF,而第2组有113例患者(79%)维持稳定窦性心律(P<0.0001)。第1组有58例患者(58%)记录到持续性或永久性AF,而第2组为11例(8%)(P<0.0001)。
在本系列研究中,(i)接受A&P和PVI治疗的药物难治性AF患者在临床特征上存在显著差异;(ii)A&P是一种更短且复杂性更低的手术,但持续性AF发生率更高;(iii)PVI组阵发性AF的症状性复发更频繁。对于特定病例,似乎有必要进行随机研究以确定最佳策略。