de Wit J J, Davelaar F G, Braunius W W
Animal Health Service of Oost Nederland, AA Deventer, The Netherlands.
Avian Pathol. 1992 Dec;21(4):651-8. doi: 10.1080/03079459208418886.
Serological results as obtained by the agar gel precipitation (AGP) test, haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test (M41, D274, D1466) and an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from commercial broiler flocks, which had suffered from a clinical infectious bronchitis (IB) infection in the fattening period, were compared with serological findings of control broiler flocks. In addition the Hi-test and ELISA for Newcastle disease (ND) were compared. The AGP results differ significantly between groups. The test had a low sensitivity. The results of the HI-IBV tests were similar for both groups and no difference was seen between flocks with or without clinical IB problems. The IBV ELISA showed a highly significant difference between the two groups. In contrast to the low and not significant correlation coefficients (r) between the IBV HI tests and the ELISA, the value of r between the NDV HI and ELISA was high. The results indicate an ELISA as the preferred test for the diagnosis of IB in broilers.
对育肥期曾患临床传染性支气管炎(IB)感染的商业肉鸡群,通过琼脂凝胶沉淀(AGP)试验、血凝抑制(HI)试验(M41、D274、D1466)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)获得的血清学结果,与对照肉鸡群的血清学结果进行了比较。此外,还比较了新城疫(ND)的HI试验和ELISA。AGP结果在各组之间有显著差异。该试验敏感性较低。两组的HI-IBV试验结果相似,有或无临床IB问题的鸡群之间未观察到差异。IBV ELISA显示两组之间有极显著差异。与IBV HI试验和ELISA之间较低且无显著意义的相关系数(r)相反,NDV HI和ELISA之间的r值较高。结果表明ELISA是诊断肉鸡IB的首选试验。