Cahalan T D, Cooney W P, Tamai K, Chao E Y
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Am J Sports Med. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):288-93. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900314.
Golf is an activity generally stressful to the hands and wrists and particularly can produce increasing symptoms in players with underlying problems such as hand and wrist arthritis or tendinitis. The purpose of this study was to quantitate wrist motion and club head/ball impact force in subjects with pathologic conditions of the hand, wrist, or forearm, within a laboratory environment. A regular straight-handled golf club was compared to a new BioCurve handle design that has a 19 degrees ulnar bend. We measured and compared the effect of the two grips on wrist motion, club head velocity, ball impact force, ball impact location, and isometric torsional strength in 20 subjects who had a variety of upper extremity disorders. This data was then compared to data collected in an identical fashion from golfers without such conditions. The results of our study show that there were no differences related to club handle design on impact force or impact location, club head velocity, or club head path and face angle. Wrist kinematic differences were minimal between handle designs. The differences that were significant (P less than 0.05) centered around the decreased ulnar deviation of the left hand that resulted when subjects used the BioCurve handle design, which also allowed greater resistance to torque than the straight grip club. In addition to collecting objective data, we asked subjects for their opinions of the two grips. As a whole, the normal group and the group with pathologic conditions noted more comfort, improved grip, and less shock transmission with the BioCurve handle.
高尔夫运动通常会给手部和手腕带来压力,对于患有手部和手腕关节炎或肌腱炎等潜在问题的球员来说,尤其会使症状加重。本研究的目的是在实验室环境中,对患有手部、手腕或前臂病理状况的受试者的手腕运动以及球杆头/球撞击力进行量化。将常规的直柄高尔夫球杆与一种新的BioCurve握把设计进行比较,该握把设计有19度的尺侧弯曲。我们测量并比较了这两种握把对20名患有各种上肢疾病的受试者的手腕运动、球杆头速度、球撞击力、球撞击位置以及等长扭转强度的影响。然后将这些数据与以相同方式从没有此类状况的高尔夫球手那里收集的数据进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,在撞击力、撞击位置、球杆头速度、球杆头路径和杆面角度方面,与球杆握把设计无关。两种握把设计之间的手腕运动学差异很小。显著差异(P小于0.05)集中在受试者使用BioCurve握把设计时左手尺侧偏斜的减小,并且该握把设计比直握式球杆对扭矩的抵抗力更强。除了收集客观数据外,我们还询问了受试者对这两种握把的看法。总体而言,正常组和患有病理状况的组都指出,使用BioCurve握把时更舒适、握感更好且震动传递更少。