Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤康复中用于移动性和自我护理的物理治疗、职业治疗及运动治疗干预分类系统的可行性

Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

作者信息

van Langeveld Sacha A, Post Marcel W, van Asbeck Floris W, Postma Karin, Leenders Jacqueline, Pons Kees

机构信息

Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of a classification system developed to record the contents of treatment sessions intended to improve mobility and self-care by persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in clinical rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

Three Dutch SCI facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=36) as well as physical therapists (n=20), occupational therapists (n=14), and sports therapists (n=2).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires to assess the clarity of the classification system, time needed to record 1 treatment session, and the distribution of categories and interventions. The classification system consisted of 28 categories at 3 levels of functioning: basic functions (eg, muscle power), basic activities (eg, transfers), and complex activities (eg, walking and moving around outside).

RESULTS

Therapists used 1625 codes to record 856 treatment sessions of 142 patients. For 93% of the treatment sessions, the coding caused little or no doubt. The therapists were able to classify 86.3% of the treatment sessions within 3 minutes. The classification system was rated as useful and easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the suitability of our classification system as a tool to record the contents of SCI treatment sessions in different settings and by different therapists.

摘要

目的

测试一种分类系统的可行性,该系统旨在记录脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在临床康复中为改善活动能力和自我护理而进行的治疗课程内容。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

三家荷兰脊髓损伤治疗机构。

参与者

参与者(N = 36)以及物理治疗师(n = 20)、职业治疗师(n = 14)和运动治疗师(n = 2)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

用于评估分类系统清晰度、记录1次治疗课程所需时间以及类别和干预措施分布情况的问卷。该分类系统在3个功能水平上由28个类别组成:基本功能(如肌肉力量)、基本活动(如转移)和复杂活动(如行走和户外移动)。

结果

治疗师使用1625个编码记录了142名患者的856次治疗课程。对于93%的治疗课程,编码几乎没有或没有引起疑问。治疗师能够在3分钟内对86.3%的治疗课程进行分类。该分类系统被评为有用且易于使用。

结论

研究结果支持我们的分类系统作为一种工具,适用于在不同环境中由不同治疗师记录脊髓损伤治疗课程的内容。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验