van Langeveld Sacha A, Post Marcel W, van Asbeck Floris W, Postma Karin, Leenders Jacqueline, Pons Kees
Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.044.
To test the feasibility of a classification system developed to record the contents of treatment sessions intended to improve mobility and self-care by persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in clinical rehabilitation.
Descriptive study.
Three Dutch SCI facilities.
Participants (N=36) as well as physical therapists (n=20), occupational therapists (n=14), and sports therapists (n=2).
Not applicable.
Questionnaires to assess the clarity of the classification system, time needed to record 1 treatment session, and the distribution of categories and interventions. The classification system consisted of 28 categories at 3 levels of functioning: basic functions (eg, muscle power), basic activities (eg, transfers), and complex activities (eg, walking and moving around outside).
Therapists used 1625 codes to record 856 treatment sessions of 142 patients. For 93% of the treatment sessions, the coding caused little or no doubt. The therapists were able to classify 86.3% of the treatment sessions within 3 minutes. The classification system was rated as useful and easy to use.
The findings support the suitability of our classification system as a tool to record the contents of SCI treatment sessions in different settings and by different therapists.
测试一种分类系统的可行性,该系统旨在记录脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在临床康复中为改善活动能力和自我护理而进行的治疗课程内容。
描述性研究。
三家荷兰脊髓损伤治疗机构。
参与者(N = 36)以及物理治疗师(n = 20)、职业治疗师(n = 14)和运动治疗师(n = 2)。
不适用。
用于评估分类系统清晰度、记录1次治疗课程所需时间以及类别和干预措施分布情况的问卷。该分类系统在3个功能水平上由28个类别组成:基本功能(如肌肉力量)、基本活动(如转移)和复杂活动(如行走和户外移动)。
治疗师使用1625个编码记录了142名患者的856次治疗课程。对于93%的治疗课程,编码几乎没有或没有引起疑问。治疗师能够在3分钟内对86.3%的治疗课程进行分类。该分类系统被评为有用且易于使用。
研究结果支持我们的分类系统作为一种工具,适用于在不同环境中由不同治疗师记录脊髓损伤治疗课程的内容。