DiPaola Christian P, DiPaola Matthew J, Conrad Bryan P, Horodyski MaryBeth, Del Rossi Gianluca, Sawers Andrew, Rechtine Glenn R
Departments of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90(8):1698-704. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00818.
Patients who have sustained a spinal cord injury remain at risk for further neurologic deterioration until the spine is adequately stabilized. To our knowledge, no study has previously addressed the effects of different bed-to-operating room table transfer techniques on thoracolumbar spinal motion in an instability model. We hypothesized that the conventional logroll technique used to transfer patients from a supine position to a prone position on the operating room table has the potential to confer significantly more motion to the unstable thoracolumbar spine than the Jackson technique.
Three-column instability was surgically created at the L1 level in seven cadavers. Two protocols were tested. The manual technique entailed performing a standard logroll of a supine cadaver to a prone position on an operating room Jackson table. The Jackson technique involved sliding the supine cadaver to the Jackson table, securing it to the table, and then rotating it into a prone position. An electromagnetic tracking device measured motion--i.e., angular motion (flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) and linear translation (axial, medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior) between T12 and L2.
The logroll technique created significantly more motion than the Jackson technique as measured with all six parameters. Manual logroll transfers produced an average of 13.8 degrees to 18.1 degrees of maximum angular displacement and 16.6 to 28.3 mm of maximum linear translation. The Jackson technique resulted in an average of 3.1 degrees to 5.8 degrees of maximum angular displacement (p < 0.001) and 4.0 to 10.0 mm of maximum linear translation (p < 0.05).
Compared with the logroll, the Jackson-table transfer method provides superior immobilization of an unstable thoracolumbar spine during transfer of supine cadavers to a prone position on the operating room table.
This study addresses in-hospital patient safety. Performing the Jackson turn requires approximately half as many people as required for a manual logroll. This study suggests that the Jackson technique should be considered for supine-to-prone transfer of patients with known or suspected instability of the thoracolumbar spine.
在脊柱得到充分稳定之前,脊髓损伤患者仍有进一步神经功能恶化的风险。据我们所知,此前尚无研究探讨在不稳定模型中不同的从病床转移至手术台的技术对胸腰椎脊柱运动的影响。我们推测,用于将患者从仰卧位转移至手术台上俯卧位的传统滚动法,相较于杰克逊技术,有可能使不稳定的胸腰椎脊柱产生显著更多的运动。
在7具尸体的L1水平手术制造三柱不稳定。测试了两种方案。手动技术是将仰卧的尸体在手术室杰克逊手术台上标准滚动至俯卧位。杰克逊技术是将仰卧的尸体滑至杰克逊手术台,固定在台上,然后旋转至俯卧位。一个电磁跟踪装置测量T12和L2之间的运动,即角运动(屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转)和线性平移(轴向、内外侧和前后)。
用所有六个参数测量时,滚动法产生的运动明显多于杰克逊技术。手动滚动转移产生的最大角位移平均为13.8度至18.1度,最大线性平移为16.6至28.3毫米。杰克逊技术导致的最大角位移平均为3.1度至5.8度(p<0.001),最大线性平移为4.0至10.0毫米(p<0.05)。
与滚动法相比,在将仰卧尸体转移至手术室手术台上俯卧位的过程中,杰克逊手术台转移方法能更好地固定不稳定的胸腰椎脊柱。
本研究涉及院内患者安全。进行杰克逊翻转所需的人数约为手动滚动法的一半。本研究表明,对于已知或疑似胸腰椎脊柱不稳定的患者,仰卧至俯卧转移时应考虑采用杰克逊技术。