Suppr超能文献

在将俯卧位的患者转移到脊柱板上时,不稳定颈椎的运动。

Motion in the unstable cervical spine when transferring a patient positioned prone to a spine board.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville;

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):797-803. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.5.07. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Two methods have been proposed to transfer an individual in the prone position to a spine board. Researchers do not know which method provides the best immobilization.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if motion produced in the unstable cervical spine differs between 2 prone logrolling techniques and to evaluate the effect of equipment on the motion produced during prone logrolling.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Tests were performed on 5 fresh cadavers (3 men, 2 women; age = 83 ± 8 years, mass = 61.2 ± 14.1 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three-dimensional motions were recorded during 2 prone logroll protocols (pull, push) in cadavers with an unstable cervical spine. Three equipment conditions were evaluated: football shoulder pads and helmet, rigid cervical collar, and no equipment. The mean range of motion was calculated for each test condition.

RESULTS

The pull technique produced 16% more motion than the push technique in the lateral-bending angulation direction (F1,4 = 19.922, P = .01, η(2) = 0.833). Whereas the collar-only condition and, to a lesser extent, the football-shoulder-pads-and-helmet condition demonstrated trends toward providing more stability than the no-equipment condition, we found no differences among equipment conditions. We noted an interaction between technique and equipment, with the pull maneuver performed without equipment producing more anteroposterior motion than the push maneuver in any of the equipment conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

We saw a slight difference in the motion measured during the 2 prone logrolling techniques tested, with less lateral-bending and anteroposterior motion produced with the logroll push than the pull technique. Therefore, we recommend adopting the push technique as the preferred spine-boarding maneuver when a patient is found in the prone position. Researchers should continue to seek improved methods for performing prone spine-board transfers to further decrease the motion produced in the unstable spine.

摘要

背景

有两种方法被提议用于将俯卧位的个体转移到脊柱板上。研究人员不知道哪种方法提供最佳的固定效果。

目的

确定在两种俯卧翻身技术中不稳定颈椎产生的运动是否存在差异,并评估设备对俯卧翻身过程中产生的运动的影响。

设计

交叉研究。

环境

实验室。

患者或其他参与者

对 5 具新鲜尸体(3 名男性,2 名女性;年龄=83±8 岁,体重=61.2±14.1kg)进行了测试。

主要观察结果

在有不稳定颈椎的尸体上进行两种俯卧翻身协议(拉、推)时,记录了三维运动。评估了三种设备条件:橄榄球肩垫和头盔、刚性颈椎固定器和无设备。计算了每种测试条件的平均运动范围。

结果

在侧屈角度方向上,拉技术比推技术产生的运动多 16%(F1,4=19.922,P=0.01,η2=0.833)。尽管仅使用固定器的条件,以及在较小程度上使用橄榄球肩垫和头盔的条件,与无设备条件相比,表现出提供更高稳定性的趋势,但我们发现设备条件之间没有差异。我们注意到技术和设备之间存在相互作用,在没有任何设备的情况下进行的拉操作比在任何设备条件下进行的推操作产生更多的前后运动。

结论

我们在测试的两种俯卧翻身技术中观察到运动测量值略有差异,与推技术相比,拉技术产生的侧屈和前后运动较少。因此,我们建议在发现患者处于俯卧位时,采用推技术作为首选脊柱板固定操作。研究人员应继续寻求改进的俯卧脊柱板转移方法,以进一步减少不稳定脊柱产生的运动。

相似文献

1
Motion in the unstable cervical spine when transferring a patient positioned prone to a spine board.
J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):797-803. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.5.07. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
4
Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):273-80. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31811513a4.
5
Motion in the unstable thoracolumbar spine when spine boarding a prone patient.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jan;35(1):53-7. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000045.
6
Helmet and shoulder pad removal from a player with suspected cervical spine injury. A cadaveric model.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 15;23(16):1729-32; discussion 1732-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00003.
7
The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.
J Athl Train. 2008 Jan-Mar;43(1):6-13. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.6.
9
Motion is reduced in the unstable spine with the use of mechanical devices for bed transfers.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2013 Jan;36(1):58-65. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000027.
10
Is it safe to use a kinetic therapy bed for care of patients with cervical spine injuries?
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):388-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.049. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliminating log rolling as a spine trauma order.
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 3):S188-97. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.98584. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
2
Motion in the unstable thoracolumbar spine when spine boarding a prone patient.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jan;35(1):53-7. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000045.
3
Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury.
J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
4
Effectiveness of cervical spine stabilization techniques.
Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Mar;21(2):80-8. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31820f8ad5.
5
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.014. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
10
Motion generated in the unstable lumbar spine during hospital bed transfers.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Feb;22(1):45-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ce604.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验