• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development of evidence-based performance measures for bipolar disorder: overview of methodology.

作者信息

Golden William E, Hermann Richard C, Jewell Mark, Brewster Cheryl

机构信息

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 May;14 Suppl 2:18-30. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000320123.91799.e4.

DOI:10.1097/01.pra.0000320123.91799.e4
PMID:18677196
Abstract

The STAndards for BipoLar Excellence (STABLE) Project was organized in 2005 to improve quality of care for bipolar disorder by developing and testing a set of evidence-based clinical process performance measures related to identifying, assessing, managing, and coordinating care for bipolar disorder. This article first briefly reviews the literature on the science of performance measurement and the use of performance measures as a tool for quality improvement. It then presents a detailed overview of the methodology used to develop the STABLE performance measures. Steps included choosing a clinical area to be measured, selecting key aspects of care for measurement, designing specifications for the measures, developing a data collection strategy, testing the scientific strength (validity, reliability, feasibility) of the measures, and obtaining, analyzing, and reporting conformance findings for the measures. Five of the STABLE measures have been endorsed by the National Quality Forum as part of their Standardizing Ambulatory Care Performance Measures project: screening for bipolar mania/hypomania in patients diagnosed with depression, assessment for risk of suicide, assessment for substance use, screening for hyperglycemia when atypical antipsychotic agents are prescribed, and monitoring change in level of functioning in response to treatment. Additional STABLE measures will be submitted to appropriate national organizations in the future. It is hoped that these measures will be used in quality assessment activities and that the results will inform efforts to improve care for individuals with bipolar disorder.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development of evidence-based performance measures for bipolar disorder: overview of methodology.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 May;14 Suppl 2:18-30. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000320123.91799.e4.
2
Overview of the STAndards for BipoLar Excellence (STABLE) project.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 May;14 Suppl 2:5-7. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000320121.46058.d0.
3
Collaborative mental health and primary care for bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍的协作式心理健康与初级保健。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 May;14 Suppl 2:55-64. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000320127.84175.20.
4
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
5
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Clinical and economic effects of unrecognized or inadequately treated bipolar disorder.未识别或治疗不充分的双相情感障碍的临床和经济影响。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 May;14 Suppl 2:31-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000320124.91799.2a.
7
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
8
Reporting outcomes in clinical trials for bipolar disorder: a commentary and suggestions for change.双相情感障碍临床试验中的结果报告:评论与变革建议
Bipolar Disord. 2008 Jul;10(5):566-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2008.00611.x.
9
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
10
Mental health quality and accountability: the role of evidence-based practices and performance measurement.心理健康质量与问责制:循证实践和绩效评估的作用。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):659-65. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0071-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review.整合指南制定和质量指标发展的方法:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 16;20(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05665-w.
2
Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures.基于指南的绩效指标报告标准。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 15;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z.
3
Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review.基于指南的质量指标制定方法——系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-21.
4
Implementing composite quality metrics for bipolar disorder: towards a more comprehensive approach to quality measurement.实施双相情感障碍的综合质量指标:走向更全面的质量测量方法。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 30.