Fridman V S, Eremkin G S, Zakharova-Kubareva N Iu
Zh Obshch Biol. 2008 May-Jun;69(3):207-19.
The present research deals with urbanization of wild bird and mammal species. Forms and mechanisms of population steadiness in the urban landscape have been examined. The urbanization process turned out to be a directed change of the population system forming de novo in the urbolandscape leading to a sustainable organization peculiar for the particular environment. The population organization of different types in urbolandscape is found to provide its stability under conditions of directed and fast changes accompanied with instability and heterogenous structure of habitats. It is shown that the same type of population organization meets the corresponding demands among different species settling in the urban environment. Its features are "openness" and "flowage" of the groups, far order of settlement levels and other units of population system, constant movements of the individuals between the groups as a respond to the signals of urboenvironment significant changes. The "urban" variant of the population system organization turns out to be opposite to that of the same species in the non-urban habitats. After formation of the urban types by the species and successful developing of the town, the urban population becomes separated from the maternal local population and begins to exist independently in the urban landscape. The variety of adaptation aberrations in ecology, behavior, and mode of life of urban birds is the population system stability function in the urban landscape and is not a results of individual selection. It is shown that the urbanization process of the species goes firstly on the population level being the system structure transformation developed by the species towards the most stable state in the town (city) territory. Only after the appearance of stable urban population, the urban individuals show the rapid growth of different changes in ecology, behavior, mode of life that was traditionally described by naturalists as species adaptation to the city conditions. The key features of urban population stability/instability are described. Their application to closely related species allows us to distinguish potential urbanists from instable and vulnerable species that could be soon pushed out of the city. The application of corresponding criteria to the urban populations of such species constituting one guild allows us to predict if their developing in the given town would be successful or unsuccessful. The latter is very important since close species are, as a rule, ecologically indistinguishable in the urbanized landscapes. So one can not predict successful/unsuccessful urbanization taking into account the differences in the range of habitats, breeding success, and other external features.
本研究涉及野生鸟类和哺乳动物物种的城市化。研究了城市景观中种群稳定性的形式和机制。城市化进程原来是城市景观中种群系统的一种定向变化,这种变化会重新形成一种独特的、适合特定环境的可持续组织。研究发现,城市景观中不同类型的种群组织在栖息地不稳定且结构各异的情况下,能在定向且快速的变化中保持稳定。研究表明,同一类型的种群组织能满足定居于城市环境的不同物种的相应需求。其特征包括群体的“开放性”和“流动性”、定居层次和种群系统其他单元的远距离排序、个体因城市环境重大变化的信号而在群体间持续移动。种群系统组织的“城市”变体与同一物种在非城市栖息地的情况相反。在物种形成城市类型并成功发展城镇后,城市种群与母本地种群分离,并开始在城市景观中独立存在。城市鸟类在生态、行为和生活方式上的各种适应异常是城市景观中种群系统稳定性的功能体现,而非个体选择的结果。研究表明,物种的城市化进程首先发生在种群层面,这是物种为在城镇(城市)区域达到最稳定状态而进行的系统结构转变。只有在稳定的城市种群出现后,城市个体才会在生态、行为、生活方式上迅速出现各种变化,这些变化传统上被博物学家描述为物种对城市条件的适应。文中描述了城市种群稳定性/不稳定性的关键特征。将这些特征应用于近缘物种,能让我们区分潜在的城市适应者与不稳定和易受影响的物种,后者可能很快被赶出城市。将相应标准应用于构成一个群落的此类物种的城市种群,能让我们预测它们在特定城镇的发展是成功还是失败。这一点非常重要,因为在城市化景观中,近缘物种通常在生态上难以区分。因此,考虑栖息地范围、繁殖成功率和其他外部特征的差异,无法预测城市化的成功与否。