Lim Lee Wei, Temel Yasin, Visser-Vandewalle Veerle, Steinbusch Harry, Schruers Koen, Hameleers Rob, Esquivel Gabriel, Griez Eric, Blokland Arjan
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2008;58(6):269-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296506.
Buspirone (CAS 33386-08-2) is reported to have anxiolytic effects in humans and is mostly described for mild anxiety. To further explore the effects of buspirone on different levels of anxiety, the effect of buspirone was evaluated in two different conditions of the open field which were distinguished as low and high anxiety (enclosed and exposed open field, respectively).
Twenty-eight albino Wistar rats (350-400 g) were tested in two different arena settings, an enclosed and an exposed open field. Fourteen animals were initially injected with 1 ml saline while the others (n = 14) received buspirone 3 mg/kg.
The data showed clear differences in the two open-field settings, suggesting a higher anxiety level in the exposed open field. In addition, correlation analysis showed that the two anxiety tests measure different aspects of anxiety. Buspirone treatment reduced the behavioral activity in both the enclosed and exposed open-field, which is generally interpreted as an anxiogenic effect. However, buspirone increased the time in the center areas and decreased the frequencies in the outer regions. These behavioral changes are generally seen as an anxiolytic effect. Correlation analysis showed that buspirone treatment disrupted the relation between indices of anxiety.
These results showed that in an open-field setting buspirone appears to have a dual effect. The reduced activity and increase in time spent in the center areas are indicative of both an anxiogenic and an anxiolytic effect, respectively. This was found in both open-field settings, suggesting that the effects of buspirone are independent of the anxiety level.
据报道,丁螺环酮(CAS 33386-08-2)对人类具有抗焦虑作用,主要用于治疗轻度焦虑。为了进一步探究丁螺环酮对不同程度焦虑的影响,在旷场试验的两种不同条件下评估了丁螺环酮的效果,这两种条件分别被区分为低焦虑和高焦虑(分别为封闭旷场和开放旷场)。
28只白化Wistar大鼠(350-400克)在两种不同的场地设置中进行测试,即封闭旷场和开放旷场。14只动物最初注射1毫升生理盐水,而其他动物(n = 14)接受3毫克/千克的丁螺环酮。
数据显示在两种旷场设置中存在明显差异,表明开放旷场中的焦虑水平更高。此外,相关性分析表明这两种焦虑测试测量的是焦虑的不同方面。丁螺环酮治疗降低了封闭旷场和开放旷场中的行为活动,这通常被解释为致焦虑作用。然而,丁螺环酮增加了在中心区域的停留时间,并减少了在外围区域的活动频率。这些行为变化通常被视为抗焦虑作用。相关性分析表明丁螺环酮治疗破坏了焦虑指标之间的关系。
这些结果表明,在旷场设置中丁螺环酮似乎具有双重作用。活动减少和在中心区域停留时间增加分别表明有致焦虑和抗焦虑作用。在两种旷场设置中均发现了这一点,表明丁螺环酮的作用与焦虑水平无关。