Garnick Deborah W, Horgan Constance M, Lee Margaret T, Panas Lee, Ritter Grant A, Davis Steve, Leeper Tracy, Moore Rebecca, Reynolds Mark
Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Dec;33(4):341-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 May 23.
This study examines the association between adherence to during-treatment process measures of quality (defined as initiation and engagement in treatment as developed by the Washington Circle) and outcome measures (defined as arrests and incarcerations) in the following year. The data come from the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services administrative data system linked to data from state criminal justice agencies. Clients who initiated a new episode of outpatient treatment and who engaged in treatment were significantly less likely to be arrested or incarcerated in the following year. Initiation of substance abuse treatment alone, without engagement in treatment, was not significantly associated with arrests or incarcerations. These findings validate the clinical importance of the Washington Circle performance measures of initiation and engagement. Applying the "process-of-care" measures can make a difference when they are used as a target for quality improvement in treatment facilities.
本研究考察了在治疗过程中对质量指标(定义为华盛顿小组制定的治疗启动和参与情况)的依从性与次年的结果指标(定义为逮捕和监禁情况)之间的关联。数据来自俄克拉荷马州心理健康与药物滥用服务部的行政数据系统,该系统与州刑事司法机构的数据相链接。开始新的门诊治疗并参与治疗的客户在次年被捕或被监禁的可能性显著降低。仅开始药物滥用治疗但未参与治疗,与逮捕或监禁情况无显著关联。这些发现证实了华盛顿小组治疗启动和参与绩效指标的临床重要性。当将“照护过程”指标用作治疗机构质量改进的目标时,会产生显著效果。