Dowell James A, Frost Dustin C, Zhang Jiang, Li Lingjun
School of Pharmacy and Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2222, USA.
Anal Chem. 2008 Sep 1;80(17):6715-23. doi: 10.1021/ac8007994. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
Two-dimensional (2D) fractionation is a commonly used tool to increase dynamic range and proteome coverage for bottom-up, shotgun proteomics. However, there are few reports comparing the relative separation efficiencies of 2D methodologies using low-microgram sample quantities. In order to systematically evaluate 2D separation techniques, we fractionated microgram quantities of E. coli protein extract by seven different methods. The first dimension of separation was performed with either reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), or strong cation exchange (SCX-HPLC). The second dimension consisted of a standard reversed-phase capillary HPLC coupled to an electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer for tandem mass spectrometric analysis. The overall performance and relative fractionation efficiencies of each technique were assessed by comparing the total number of proteins identified by each method. The protein-level RP-HPLC and the high-pH RP-HPLC peptide-level separations performed the best, identifying 281 and 266 proteins, respectively. The online pH variance SCX and the SDS-PAGE returned modest performances with 178 and 139 proteins identified, respectively. The offline SCX had the worst performance with 81 proteins identified. We also examined various chromatographic factors that contribute to separation efficiency, including resolving power, orthogonality, and sample loss.
二维(2D)分级分离是一种常用的工具,用于提高自下而上的鸟枪法蛋白质组学的动态范围和蛋白质组覆盖率。然而,很少有报告比较使用低微克样品量的二维方法的相对分离效率。为了系统地评估二维分离技术,我们用七种不同方法对微克量的大肠杆菌蛋白提取物进行了分级分离。第一维分离采用反相高压液相色谱(RP-HPLC)、凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)或强阳离子交换(SCX-HPLC)。第二维由与电喷雾电离四极杆飞行时间质谱仪联用的标准反相毛细管HPLC组成,用于串联质谱分析。通过比较每种方法鉴定出的蛋白质总数来评估每种技术的整体性能和相对分级分离效率。蛋白质水平的RP-HPLC和高pH值RP-HPLC肽水平的分离表现最佳,分别鉴定出281种和266种蛋白质。在线pH值变化的SCX和SDS-PAGE的表现一般,分别鉴定出178种和139种蛋白质。离线SCX的表现最差,仅鉴定出81种蛋白质。我们还研究了影响分离效率的各种色谱因素,包括分离能力、正交性和样品损失。