Osawa Takeshi
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.
J Anesth. 2008;22(3):236-41. doi: 10.1007/s00540-008-0613-7. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
To clarify differences between the diaphragm and the limb muscles in terms of the effects of neuromuscular blockers concerning train-of-four (TOF) ratios, we compared the recovery of twitch tensions and TOF ratios in the diaphragm and in the tibialis anterior muscle in rats in vivo.
We conducted a dose-response study in 16 rats and a recovery study in 8 rats. In the recovery study, we made phrenic nerve-diaphragm and sciatic nerve-tibialis anterior preparations simultaneously in each of 8 rats that were anesthetized intraperitoneally with pentobarbitone (30 mg x kg(-1)) and urethane (500 mg x kg(-1)). After supramaximal stimuli were applied simultaneously in a TOF pattern to both the phrenic and sciatic nerves, rocuronium was injected intravenously, at 10 mg x kg(-1). In the diaphragm and the tibialis anterior muscle, we monitored the first-twitch response to TOF stimuli (T1) and also the TOF ratios. The following variables were determined for each muscle: (1) the times at which T1 recovered to 25%, 50%, and 75% of control T1, and the times at which the TOF ratio recovered to 25%, 50%, and 75%; and (2) the values of the TOF ratio at 25%, 50%, and 75% recovery of T1.
At 25%, 50%, and 75% recovery of T1 in the diaphragm, TOF ratios were 8.9 +/- 5.0 %, 26.7 +/- 7.7 %, and 55.9 +/- 5.4%, respectively, while in the tibialis anterior, the TOF ratios were 18.0 +/- 5.9%, 32.5 +/- 7.4%, and 54.4 +/- 7.5%, respectively (diaphragm vs tibialis anterior; P < 0.01 for comparisons at both 25% and 50% recovery of T1).
Our method of simultaneous in vivo evaluation of TOF ratios in both the diaphragm and the tibialis anterior confirmed significant differences between the two muscles in relationships between first-twitch tension and the TOF ratio.
为了阐明膈肌与肢体肌肉在神经肌肉阻滞剂对四个成串刺激(TOF)比率影响方面的差异,我们在大鼠体内比较了膈肌和胫前肌的抽搐张力恢复情况以及TOF比率。
我们对16只大鼠进行了剂量反应研究,并对8只大鼠进行了恢复研究。在恢复研究中,我们在8只腹腔注射戊巴比妥(30 mg·kg⁻¹)和乌拉坦(500 mg·kg⁻¹)麻醉的大鼠中,同时制备膈神经-膈肌和坐骨神经-胫前肌标本。以TOF模式同时对膈神经和坐骨神经施加超强刺激后,静脉注射罗库溴铵,剂量为10 mg·kg⁻¹。在膈肌和胫前肌中,我们监测对TOF刺激的第一个抽搐反应(T1)以及TOF比率。为每块肌肉测定以下变量:(1)T1恢复到对照T1的25%、50%和75%的时间,以及TOF比率恢复到25%、50%和75%的时间;(2)T1恢复到25%、50%和75%时的TOF比率值。
在膈肌T1恢复到25%、50%和75%时,TOF比率分别为8.9±5.0%、26.7±7.7%和55.9±5.4%,而在胫前肌中,TOF比率分别为18.0±5.9%、32.5±7.4%和54.4±7.5%(膈肌与胫前肌比较;T1恢复到25%和50%时的比较P均<0.01)。
我们同时在体内评估膈肌和胫前肌TOF比率的方法证实了这两块肌肉在首次抽搐张力与TOF比率关系上存在显著差异。