Cantineau J P, Porte F, d'Honneur G, Duvaldestin P
Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France.
Anesthesiology. 1994 Sep;81(3):585-90. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199409000-00010.
Rocuronium has properties that may make it suitable for rapid-sequence intubation. However, its neuromuscular effects have been studied only on the adductor pollicis. This study compares the neuromuscular effect of rocuronium on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis in humans.
The forces generated by the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis during supramaximal single-twitch stimulation of the phrenic and ulnar nerves, respectively, were studied during thiopental, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide-oxygen anesthesia. In 6 patients, cumulative doses of 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45, and 0.60 mg.kg-1 rocuronium were given over a 9-min period. The doses for 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) depression of twitch height were calculated. In another 12 patients, the times for maximal effect and 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% recovery of the twitch height were calculated after a bolus dose of 0.60 mg.kg-1 rocuronium.
ED50 and ED95 were higher for the diaphragm (0.26 +/- 0.07 and 0.50 +/- 0.20 mg.kg-1, respectively) than for the adductor pollicis (0.14 +/- 0.05 and 0.24 +/- 0.04 mg.kg-1). Rocuronium 0.60 mg.kg-1 produced 100% paralysis of the adductor pollicis in all patients and of the diaphragm in 9 of 12 patients. The onset time for muscle relaxation after 0.6 mg.kg-1 rocuronium was shorter for the adductor pollicis than for the diaphragm (80 +/- 20 vs. 120 +/- 62 s). Times for 10%, 25%, 75%, and 90% recovery of twitch height were 34 +/- 10, 40 +/- 13, 56 +/- 20, and 64 +/- 21 min, respectively, for the adductor pollicis, and significantly shorter for the diaphragm: 17 +/- 10, 23 +/- 9, 33 +/- 13, and 35 +/- 10 min, respectively.
The diaphragm is more resistant than the adductor pollicis to rocuronium, as shown by greater ED50 and ED95 and faster recovery of the twitch height. The intubating dose of 0.60 mg.kg-1 is close to the ED95 of 0.50 mg.kg-1 for the diaphragm.
罗库溴铵具有一些特性,可能使其适用于快速顺序诱导插管。然而,其神经肌肉效应仅在拇内收肌上进行过研究。本研究比较了罗库溴铵对人体膈肌和拇内收肌的神经肌肉效应。
在硫喷妥钠、芬太尼和氧化亚氮-氧气麻醉期间,分别对膈神经和尺神经进行超强单刺激,研究膈肌和拇内收肌产生的力量。在6例患者中,于9分钟内给予累积剂量为0.15、0.25、0.35、0.45和0.60mg·kg⁻¹的罗库溴铵。计算使颤搐高度抑制50%(ED50)和95%(ED95)的剂量。在另外12例患者中,给予0.60mg·kg⁻¹罗库溴铵推注剂量后,计算达到最大效应的时间以及颤搐高度恢复10%、25%、50%、75%和90%的时间。
膈肌的ED50和ED95(分别为0.26±0.07和0.50±0.20mg·kg⁻¹)高于拇内收肌(分别为0.14±0.05和0.24±0.04mg·kg⁻¹)。0.60mg·kg⁻¹的罗库溴铵使所有患者的拇内收肌和12例患者中的9例膈肌产生100%麻痹。0.6mg·kg⁻¹罗库溴铵后肌肉松弛的起效时间,拇内收肌短于膈肌(80±20秒对120±62秒)。拇内收肌颤搐高度恢复10%、25%、75%和90%的时间分别为34±10、40±13、56±20和64±21分钟,膈肌的恢复时间明显更短,分别为17±10、23±9、33±13和35±10分钟。
如更高的ED50和ED95以及更快的颤搐高度恢复所示,膈肌对罗库溴铵的耐受性高于拇内收肌。0.60mg·kg⁻¹的插管剂量接近膈肌ED95的0.50mg·kg⁻¹。