Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.
Syst Biol. 2008 Aug;57(4):628-46. doi: 10.1080/10635150802302443.
Here we present an objective, repeatable approach to delineating species when populations are divergent and highly structured geographically using the Californian trapdoor spider species complex Aptostichus atomarius Simon as a model system. This system is particularly difficult because under strict criteria of geographical concordance coupled with estimates of genetic divergence, an unrealistic number of population lineages would qualify as species (20 to 60). Our novel phylogeographic approach, which is generally applicable but particularly relevant to highly structured systems, uses genealogical exclusivity to establish a topological framework to examine lineages for genetic and ecological exchangeability in an effort to delimit cohesion species. Both qualitative assessments of habitat and niche-based distribution modeling are employed to evaluate selective regime and ecological interchangeability among genetic lineages; adaptive divergence among populations is weighted more heavily than simple geographical concordance. Based on these analyses we conclude that five cohesion species should be recognized, three of which are new to science.
在这里,我们提出了一种客观、可重复的方法,用于在种群具有分歧且在地理上高度结构化时划定物种界限,以加利福尼亚漏斗网蜘蛛物种复合体 Aptostichus atomarius Simon 作为模型系统。这个系统特别困难,因为根据地理一致性的严格标准加上遗传分歧的估计,实际上有大量的种群谱系有资格成为物种(20 到 60 个)。我们新颖的系统发生地理方法通常适用于高度结构化的系统,它使用谱系排他性来建立拓扑框架,以检查谱系在遗传和生态上的可交换性,以划定凝聚物种。我们采用定性评估栖息地和基于生态位的分布模型来评估遗传谱系之间的选择制度和生态可互换性;种群之间的适应性分歧比简单的地理一致性更受重视。基于这些分析,我们得出结论,应该承认五个凝聚物种,其中三个是新的科学发现。