• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

界定凝聚种:极端种群结构与生态可互换性的作用

Delimiting cohesion species: extreme population structuring and the role of ecological interchangeability.

作者信息

Stockman Amy K, Bond Jason E

机构信息

East Carolina University, Department of Biology, Howell Science Complex N211, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.

出版信息

Mol Ecol. 2007 Aug;16(16):3374-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03389.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03389.x
PMID:17688540
Abstract

Species exhibiting morphological homogeneity and strong population structuring present challenging taxonomic problems: morphology-based approaches infer few species, whereas genetic approaches often indicate more. Morphologically cryptic, yet genetically divergent species groups require alternative approaches to delimiting species that assess adaptive divergence and ecological interchangeability of lineages. We apply such an approach to Promyrmekiaphila, a small genus (three nominal taxa) of trapdoor spiders endemic to northern California to define cohesion species (lineages that are genetically exchangeable and ecologically interchangeable). Genetic exchangeability is evaluated using standard phylogeographical techniques (e.g. nested clade analysis); ecological interchangeability is assessed using two GIS-based approaches. First, climatic values are extracted from layer data for each locality point and utilized in a principal components analysis followed by MANOVA. Second, niche-based distribution models of genetically divergent lineages are created using a maximum-entropy modelling approach; the amount of overlap among lineages is calculated and evaluated against a probability distribution of null overlap. Lineages that have significant amounts of predicted overlap are considered ecologically interchangeable. Based on a synthetic evaluation of ecological interchangeability, geographical concordance, and morphological differentiation, we conclude that Promyrmekiaphila comprises six cohesion species, five of which are cryptic (i.e. undetectable by conventional means).

摘要

表现出形态学同质性和强烈种群结构的物种带来了具有挑战性的分类学问题

基于形态学的方法推断出的物种较少,而遗传学方法往往显示出更多物种。形态学上隐秘但遗传学上有差异的物种群需要采用其他方法来界定物种,这些方法要评估谱系的适应性分化和生态可互换性。我们将这样一种方法应用于Promyrmekiaphila,这是一种分布于加利福尼亚北部的小型螲蟷蛛属(三个命名分类单元),以定义凝聚种(在遗传上可交换且在生态上可互换的谱系)。使用标准的系统地理学技术(如嵌套支系分析)评估遗传可交换性;使用两种基于地理信息系统的方法评估生态可互换性。首先,从每个地点的图层数据中提取气候值,并用于主成分分析,随后进行多变量方差分析。其次,使用最大熵建模方法创建遗传分化谱系的基于生态位的分布模型;计算谱系之间的重叠量,并根据零重叠的概率分布进行评估。具有大量预测重叠的谱系被认为在生态上是可互换的。基于对生态可互换性、地理一致性和形态分化的综合评估,我们得出结论,Promyrmekiaphila包含六个凝聚种,其中五个是隐秘的(即通过传统方法无法检测到)。

相似文献

1
Delimiting cohesion species: extreme population structuring and the role of ecological interchangeability.界定凝聚种:极端种群结构与生态可互换性的作用
Mol Ecol. 2007 Aug;16(16):3374-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03389.x.
2
An integrative method for delimiting cohesion species: finding the population-species interface in a group of Californian trapdoor spiders with extreme genetic divergence and geographic structuring.一种综合的凝聚种界定方法:在一群具有极端遗传分化和地理结构的加利福尼亚漏斗网蜘蛛中寻找种群-物种界面。
Syst Biol. 2008 Aug;57(4):628-46. doi: 10.1080/10635150802302443.
3
A comparison of populations of island and adjacent mainland species of Caribbean Selenops (Araneae: Selenopidae) spiders.加勒比海拟态蛛属(Araneae:Selenopidae)蜘蛛的岛屿种群与相邻大陆种群的比较。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Mar;54(3):970-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
4
Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus).在物种界定中融入更多生态学要素:生态位模型和系统发育地理学有助于界定黑斑蝾螈(Aneides flavipunctatus)中的隐存物种。
Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):924-42. doi: 10.1080/10635150701703063.
5
Landscape genetics of California mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus): the roles of ecological and historical factors in generating differentiation.加利福尼亚黑尾鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)的景观遗传学:生态和历史因素在产生分化中的作用。
Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(9):1848-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04112.x. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
6
Integrating coalescent and ecological niche modeling in comparative phylogeography.在比较系统地理学中整合溯祖理论与生态位建模
Evolution. 2007 Jun;61(6):1439-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00117.x.
7
Multilocus genealogies reveal multiple cryptic species and biogeographical complexity in the California turret spider Antrodiaetus riversi (Mygalomorphae, Antrodiaetidae).多位点系统发育树揭示了加利福尼亚炮塔蜘蛛(Antrodiaetus riversi,原蛛亚目,暗蛛科)中存在多个隐存种以及生物地理学复杂性。
Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(3):583-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03164.x.
8
A total evidence assessment of the phylogeny of North American euctenizine trapdoor spiders (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Cyrtaucheniidae) using Bayesian inference.利用贝叶斯推断对北美真螯蛛(蜘蛛目,原蛛亚目,曲腹蛛科)系统发育进行的全面证据评估。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Oct;41(1):70-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.026. Epub 2006 May 12.
9
Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar.生态位建模在物种界定中的应用:以马达加斯加日行壁虎(Phelsuma)为例的综述与实证评估
Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):907-23. doi: 10.1080/10635150701775111.
10
Lineage diversification in a widespread species: roles for niche divergence and conservatism in the common kingsnake, Lampropeltis getula.一个广泛分布物种的谱系多样化:生态位分化与保守性在王锦蛇(Lampropeltis getula)中的作用
Mol Ecol. 2009 Aug;18(16):3443-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04292.x. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Microgeographic population structuring in a genus of California trapdoor spiders and discovery of an enigmatic new species (Euctenizidae: sp. nov.).加利福尼亚活板门蛛属的微观地理种群结构及一种神秘新物种的发现(螲蟷科:新物种)
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e10983. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10983. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Phylogenomics of paleoendemic lampshade spiders (Araneae, Hypochilidae, ), with the description of a new species from montane California.古特有灯罩蜘蛛(蜘蛛目,拟壁钱科)的系统发育基因组学,以及来自加利福尼亚山区一个新物种的描述。
Zookeys. 2022 Feb 17;1086:163-204. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1086.77190. eCollection 2022.
3
Multiple data revealed two new species of the Asian horned toad Kuhl & Van Hasselt, 1822 (Anura, Megophryidae) from the eastern corner of the Himalayas.
多项数据揭示了来自喜马拉雅山东南部的两种亚洲角蟾新物种(无尾目,角蟾科),该属由库尔和范·哈塞尔特于1822年建立。
Zookeys. 2020 Oct 22;977:101-161. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.977.55693. eCollection 2020.
4
Transcriptome analysis of two radiated species and the subsequent species delimitation of the complex.两种辐射物种的转录组分析及该复合体后续的物种界定
Appl Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 16;7(10):e11292. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11292. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
(Brassicaceae), a new species from Sichuan, southwest China.(十字花科),中国西南部四川的一个新物种。
PhytoKeys. 2017 Jun 29(82):15-26. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.82.12329. eCollection 2017.
6
Species Delimitation of the Cycas segmentifida Complex (Cycadaceae) Resolved by Phylogenetic and Distance Analyses of Molecular Data.通过分子数据的系统发育和距离分析解析叉叶苏铁复合体(苏铁科)的物种界定
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 15;7:134. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00134. eCollection 2016.
7
A Combination of Divergence and Conservatism in the Niche Evolution of the Moorish Gecko, Tarentola mauritanica (Gekkota: Phyllodactylidae).摩尔壁虎(Tarentola mauritanica)生态位演化中的趋异与保守组合(壁虎目:叶趾虎科)
PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127980. eCollection 2015.
8
Species delimitation in plants using the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau endemic Orinus (Poaceae: Tridentinae) as an example.以青藏高原特有植物沙鞭属(禾本科:三齿稃亚科)为例的植物物种界定
Ann Bot. 2015 Jul;116(1):35-48. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv062. Epub 2015 May 18.
9
Spiders on a Hot Volcanic Roof: Colonisation Pathways and Phylogeography of the Canary Islands Endemic Trap-Door Spider Titanidiops canariensis (Araneae, Idiopidae).热火山屋顶上的蜘蛛:加那利群岛特有螲蟷蛛(Titanidiops canariensis)(蜘蛛目,螲蟷科)的定殖路径与系统地理学
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e115078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115078. eCollection 2014.
10
Evolutionary inferences from the analysis of exchangeability.从可交换性分析推断进化
Evolution. 2013 Dec;67(12):3429-41. doi: 10.1111/evo.12160. Epub 2013 Jun 13.