Suppr超能文献

仰卧位与俯卧位乳腺放疗中腋窝淋巴结的覆盖情况

Coverage of axillary lymph nodes in supine vs. prone breast radiotherapy.

作者信息

Alonso-Basanta Michelle, Ko Jane, Babcock Melissa, Dewyngaert J Keith, Formenti Silvia C

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 1;73(3):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.040. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the dosimetry of target and normal tissue when tangents with the breast tissue were applied in a subset of breast cancer patients who had undergone computed tomography (CT) planning both supine and prone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The CT images of 20 patients who had undergone simulation in supine and prone positions were used for planning. The axillary lymph node regions (level I-III), breast tissue, tumor bed, heart, and bilateral lungs were manually contoured. Standard tangent fields were designed for the whole breast to deliver a prescribed dose of 50 Gy. Dose-volume histograms were compared between the two sets.

RESULTS

In each patient, coverage of breast tissue and tumor bed was readily achieved by either technique. In either position, treatment of the nodal regions was inadequate. On average, the mean dose to the nodal regions for levels I-III was approximately 50% less in the prone as compared with the supine position. The mean ipsilateral lung volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose was 6.3% in the supine position compared to 0.43% in the prone position. When planned supine, the mean heart volume receiving 30 Gy was 0.56% compared with 0.30% in the prone position.

CONCLUSIONS

Planning in either position was found to achieve adequate coverage of the breast tissue and tumor bed for all patients. Lung was better spared prone. Coverage of axillary nodes was inadequate in either position, but further reduced in the prone vs. supine position. The choice of optimal setup should take into considerations stage and risk of nodal recurrence.

摘要

目的

比较在一组仰卧位和俯卧位均接受计算机断层扫描(CT)计划的乳腺癌患者中,应用与乳腺组织相切的切线野时靶区和正常组织的剂量学情况。

方法和材料

使用20例患者仰卧位和俯卧位模拟的CT图像进行计划。手动勾勒腋窝淋巴结区域(Ⅰ-Ⅲ级)、乳腺组织、瘤床、心脏和双侧肺的轮廓。为整个乳腺设计标准切线野,给予规定剂量50 Gy。比较两组的剂量体积直方图。

结果

在每例患者中,两种技术均可轻松实现乳腺组织和瘤床的覆盖。在任一位置,淋巴结区域的治疗均不充分。平均而言,与仰卧位相比,俯卧位时Ⅰ-Ⅲ级淋巴结区域的平均剂量约低50%。仰卧位时接受95%规定剂量的同侧肺平均体积为6.3%,而俯卧位为0.43%。仰卧位计划时,接受30 Gy的平均心脏体积为0.56%,而俯卧位为0.30%。

结论

发现无论采用哪种体位进行计划,所有患者的乳腺组织和瘤床均能得到充分覆盖。俯卧位时肺的受量较少。任一位置腋窝淋巴结的覆盖均不充分,但俯卧位比仰卧位时进一步减少。最佳体位的选择应考虑分期和淋巴结复发风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验