Temme Nils, Hermann Robert Michael, Hinsche Tanja, Becker Jan-Niklas, Sonnhoff Mathias, Kaltenborn Alexander, Carl Ulrich Martin, Christiansen Hans, Geworski Lilli, Nitsche Mirko
Radiologie Munchen, 80333 Muenchen, Germany.
Center for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 26655 Westerstede, Germany.
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 18;12(4):653. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040653.
In the multimodal breast-conserving curative therapy of some high-risk breast cancer patients, extended external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) not only to the breast but also to the supraclavicular fossa and the internal mammary chain (parasternal region (PSR)) is indicated. We report a dosimetric study on the EBRT of the breast ("B") and the breast including PSR ("B + PSR"), comparing the supine and the laterally tilted prone patient positions in free breathing.
The planning CT scans of 20 left- and 20 right-sided patients were analyzed. EBRT plans were calculated with 3D conformal EBRT (3D) and with intensity-modulated EBRT (IMRT) for "B" and "B + PSR" in the prone and supine positions. The mean and threshold doses were computed. The quality of EBRT plans was compared with an overall plan assessment factor (OPAF), comprising three subfactors, homogeneity, conformity, and radiogenic exposure of OAR.
In the EBRT of "B", prone positioning significantly reduced the exposure of the OARs "heart" and "ipsilateral lung" and "lymphatic regions". The OPAF was significantly better in the prone position, regardless of the planning technique or the treated breast side. In the EBRT of "B + PSR", supine positioning significantly reduced the OAR "heart" exposure but increased the dose to the OARs "ipsilateral lung" and "lymphatic regions". There were no significant differences for the OPAF, independent of the irradiated breast side. Only the IMRT planning technique increased the chance of a comparatively good EBRT plan.
Free breathing prone positioning significantly improves plan quality in the EBRT of the breast but not in the EBRT of the breast + PSR.
在一些高危乳腺癌患者的多模式保乳根治性治疗中,不仅需要对乳房进行扩大外照射放疗(EBRT),还需对锁骨上窝和内乳链(胸骨旁区域(PSR))进行照射。我们报告了一项关于乳房(“B”)和包括PSR的乳房(“B + PSR”)的EBRT剂量学研究,比较了自由呼吸状态下仰卧位和侧倾俯卧位患者的情况。
分析了20例左侧和20例右侧患者的计划CT扫描图像。使用三维适形EBRT(3D)和调强EBRT(IMRT)分别计算俯卧位和仰卧位下“B”和“B + PSR”的EBRT计划。计算平均剂量和阈值剂量。通过总体计划评估因子(OPAF)比较EBRT计划的质量,OPAF包括三个子因子:均匀性、适形性和危及器官的放射源性暴露。
在“B”的EBRT中,俯卧位显著降低了“心脏”“同侧肺”和“淋巴区域”等危及器官的照射剂量。无论采用何种计划技术或治疗的乳房侧别,俯卧位的OPAF均显著更好。在“B + PSR”的EBRT中,仰卧位显著降低了危及器官“心脏”的照射剂量,但增加了“同侧肺”和“淋巴区域”的剂量。无论照射的乳房侧别如何,OPAF均无显著差异。只有IMRT计划技术增加了获得相对较好EBRT计划的机会。
自由呼吸俯卧位显著提高了乳房EBRT的计划质量,但对乳房 + PSR的EBRT则不然。