Tada Tomohiro, Nawata Jun, Wang Huan, Onoue Noriko, Zhulanqiqige Doe, Ito Kenta, Sugimura Koichiro, Fukumoto Yoshihiro, Shimokawa Hiroaki
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan.
Cardiovasc Res. 2008 Dec 1;80(3):346-53. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn211. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Clinical studies have suggested that pulsatile pressure is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, it is unknown whether enhanced pulsatile pressure per se directly accelerates vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration, an important process of atherosclerosis.
Using our original Pressure-loading system with a Boyden chamber, we examined the direct effects of variable pressures and pulse rates on migration of rat aortic VSMCs in vitro. High pulse pressure (180/90 mmHg, pulsatile vs. 180 mmHg, static), high mean pressure (180/90 vs. 90/0 mmHg, with the same pulse pressure), wide pulse pressure (190/110 vs. 170/130 mmHg, with the same mean pressure), and high pulse rate (120 vs. 40 per min) significantly accelerated the VSMC migration (1.35, 2.38, 1.38 and 1.27-fold, respectively). The increase in intracellular calcium levels measured by fura-2/AM fluorescence was proportional to the magnitude of pressure loaded. The pressure-promoted VSMC migration was significantly inhibited by a phospholipase-C inhibitor U-73122 or a calmodulin inhibitor W-7. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor blockers 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate or xestospongin-C significantly inhibited the VSMC migration, whereas a ryanodine receptor blocker ryanodine had no effects. Furthermore, a calcium channel blocker (CCB), azelnidipine, and an angiotensin type-1 receptor blocker, olmesartan, also significantly inhibited the VSMC migration.
These results provide direct evidence for the pro-atherogenic effects of enhanced pulsatile pressure and also suggest that the anti-atherogenic actions of CCBs and angiotensin type-1 receptor blockers are mediated in part by their direct inhibitory effects on VSMC migration in addition to their anti-hypertensive effects.
临床研究表明,脉压是动脉粥样硬化的独立危险因素。然而,增强的脉压本身是否直接加速血管平滑肌细胞(VSMC)迁移这一动脉粥样硬化的重要过程尚不清楚。
使用我们原有的带有博伊登小室的压力加载系统,我们在体外研究了可变压力和脉搏率对大鼠主动脉VSMC迁移的直接影响。高脉压(180/90 mmHg,搏动性与180 mmHg,静态)、高平均压(180/90与90/0 mmHg,脉压相同)、宽脉压(190/110与170/130 mmHg,平均压相同)和高脉搏率(120与40次/分钟)均显著加速VSMC迁移(分别为1.35、2.38、1.38和1.27倍)。用fura-2/AM荧光法测量的细胞内钙水平升高与加载压力的大小成正比。压力促进的VSMC迁移被磷脂酶-C抑制剂U-73122或钙调蛋白抑制剂W-7显著抑制。肌醇1,4,5-三磷酸受体阻滞剂2-氨基乙氧基二苯硼酸或西司他汀-C显著抑制VSMC迁移,而ryanodine受体阻滞剂ryanodine则无作用。此外,钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)阿折地平及血管紧张素1型受体阻滞剂奥美沙坦也显著抑制VSMC迁移。
这些结果为增强脉压的促动脉粥样硬化作用提供了直接证据,也表明CCB和血管紧张素1型受体阻滞剂的抗动脉粥样硬化作用除其降压作用外,部分是通过它们对VSMC迁移的直接抑制作用介导的。