• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿二区屈指肌腱修复:四股与两股修复的比较研究

Zone 2 flexor tendon repair in young children: a comparative study of four-strand versus two-strand repair.

作者信息

Navali A M, Rouhani A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tabriz Medical Sciences University, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Aug;33(4):424-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090761.

DOI:10.1177/1753193408090761
PMID:18687828
Abstract

This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques. At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of interphalangeal joints was 156 degrees in the two-strand and 158 degrees in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original method, this means an average of 89% (range 57-100%) of normal function in the two-strand and 90% (range 60-100%) in the four-strand group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved with two-strand and four-strand repairs.

摘要

本研究比较了幼儿2区屈指肌腱损伤采用双股和四股修复时的手指活动范围及断裂率。共评估了29例(4岁以下)2区屈指肌腱损伤患者的32条肌腱。损伤肌腱随机采用双股或四股改良Strickland技术修复。平均随访11个月时,双股修复组指间关节平均总主动活动度为156度,四股修复组为158度。根据Strickland原始方法,这意味着双股修复组平均功能为正常的89%(范围57 - 100%),四股修复组为90%(范围60 - 100%)。四股修复无一例断裂,但有一例双股修复在修复后3周内失败。统计学上,我们未能显示双股和四股修复在手指活动范围上有任何显著差异。

相似文献

1
Zone 2 flexor tendon repair in young children: a comparative study of four-strand versus two-strand repair.幼儿二区屈指肌腱修复:四股与两股修复的比较研究
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Aug;33(4):424-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090761.
2
Long-term results after primary repairs of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in children younger than age 6 years.6岁以下儿童2区屈肌腱裂伤一期修复后的长期结果。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):732-5.
3
[Zone I and II flexor tendon laceration in children].[儿童Ⅰ区和Ⅱ区屈指肌腱损伤]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Nov;85(7):684-8.
4
Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients.小儿患者的屈肌腱损伤
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Dec;32(10):1549-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.006.
5
Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.I区屈指肌腱修复中纽扣拔出法与缝线锚钉法的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.020.
6
A six-strand technique for zone II flexor-tendon repair in children younger than 2 years of age.一种用于 2 岁以下儿童Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复的六股技术。
Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1262-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
7
Flexor tendon repair in zone II with 6-strand techniques and early active mobilization.采用6股技术并早期主动活动对Ⅱ区屈肌腱进行修复。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(6):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.012.
8
Comparison of zones 1 to 4 flexor tendon repairs using absorbable and unabsorbable four-strand core sutures.使用可吸收和不可吸收四股核心缝线对1至4区屈肌腱修复进行比较。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Aug;33(4):412-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090758.
9
Zone I flexor profundus tendon repair in children 5-10 years of age using 3 "figure of eight" sutures followed by immediate active mobilization.采用3根“8”字缝合法对5至10岁儿童进行Ⅰ区指深屈肌腱修复,随后立即进行主动活动。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jan;68(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820e0e19.
10
Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion.采用麻省总医院屈肌腱缝合术及早期保护性主动活动优化Ⅴ区屈肌腱修复后的独立手指屈曲功能。
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of patient outcomes for primary pediatric flexor tendon repairs.小儿原发性屈指肌腱修复患者预后的系统评价
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):100062. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100062. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Short-Term and Long-Term Therapeutic Results of Deep Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone II in Patients Referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz, Southern Iran.伊朗南部阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院二区屈指深肌腱修复的短期和长期治疗结果
World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(1):82-86. doi: 10.61186/wjps.13.1.82.
3
Practice Patterns in Operative Flexor Tendon Laceration Repair: A 15-Year Analysis of Continuous Certification Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.
手部屈肌腱断裂修复的手术模式:对美国整形外科委员会连续认证数据的15年分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 7;10(10):e4558. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004558. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Repair of flexor tendon injuries by four strands cruciate technique versus two strands kessler technique.四股十字技术与两股凯斯勒技术修复屈指肌腱损伤的比较
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul-Aug;11(4):646-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
[Treatment of flexor tendon injuries in children].[儿童屈指肌腱损伤的治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Feb;123(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-00757-7.
6
Pediatric flexor tendon injuries: A 10-year outcome analysis.小儿屈指肌腱损伤:一项10年的预后分析。
Can J Plast Surg. 2013 Fall;21(3):181-5. doi: 10.1177/229255031302100304.
7
The effect of tissue culture on suture holding strength and degradation in canine tendon.组织培养对犬类肌腱缝合强度及降解的影响。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Oct;34(5):643-50. doi: 10.1177/1753193409104564. Epub 2009 Jul 8.