Taut Friedemann J H, Rippin Gerd, Schenk Peter, Findlay George, Wurst Wilhelm, Häfner Dietrich, Lewis James F, Seeger Werner, Günther Andreas, Spragg Roger G
Department of Clinical Research, Nycomed, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Biometrics, Omnicare Clinical Research, Cologne, Germany.
Chest. 2008 Oct;134(4):724-732. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0362. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
Studies to date have shown no survival benefit for the use of exogenous surfactant to treat patients with the ARDS. To identify specific patient subgroups for future study, we performed an exploratory post hoc analysis of clinical trials of recombinant surfactant protein-C (rSP-C) surfactant (Venticute; Nycomed GmbH; Konstanz, Germany).
We performed a pooled analysis of all five multicenter studies in which patients with ARDS due to various predisposing events were treated with rSP-C surfactant. Patients received either usual care (n = 266) or usual care plus up to four intratracheal doses (50 mg/kg) of rSP-C surfactant (n = 266). Factors influencing the study end points were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance, and logistic regression models.
ARDS was most often associated with pneumonia or aspiration, sepsis, and trauma or surgery. For the overall patient population, treatment with rSP-C surfactant significantly improved oxygenation (p = 0.002) but had no effect on mortality (32.6%). Multivariate analysis showed age and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score to be the strongest predictors of mortality. In the subgroup of patients with severe ARDS due to pneumonia or aspiration, surfactant treatment was associated with markedly improved oxygenation (p = 0.0008) and improved survival (p = 0.018).
rSP-C surfactant improved oxygenation in patients with ARDS irrespective of the predisposition. Post hoc evidence of reduced mortality associated with surfactant treatment was obtained in patients with severe respiratory insufficiency due to pneumonia or aspiration. Those patients are the focus of a current randomized, blinded, clinical trial with rSP-C surfactant.
迄今为止的研究表明,使用外源性表面活性剂治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者并无生存获益。为了确定未来研究的特定患者亚组,我们对重组表面活性蛋白-C(rSP-C)表面活性剂(Venticute;Nycomed GmbH;德国康斯坦茨)的临床试验进行了探索性事后分析。
我们对所有五项多中心研究进行了汇总分析,这些研究中因各种诱发事件导致ARDS的患者接受了rSP-C表面活性剂治疗。患者接受常规治疗(n = 266)或常规治疗加最多四次气管内注射剂量(50 mg/kg)的rSP-C表面活性剂(n = 266)。使用描述性统计、协方差分析和逻辑回归模型分析影响研究终点的因素。
ARDS最常与肺炎或误吸、脓毒症以及创伤或手术相关。对于总体患者群体,rSP-C表面活性剂治疗显著改善了氧合(p = 0.002),但对死亡率没有影响(32.6%)。多变量分析显示年龄和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分是死亡率的最强预测因素。在因肺炎或误吸导致严重ARDS的患者亚组中,表面活性剂治疗与氧合显著改善(p = 0.0008)和生存率提高(p = 0.018)相关。
rSP-C表面活性剂改善了ARDS患者的氧合,无论其诱发因素如何。在因肺炎或误吸导致严重呼吸功能不全的患者中获得了表面活性剂治疗与死亡率降低相关的事后证据。这些患者是当前一项关于rSP-C表面活性剂的随机、盲法临床试验的重点。