Suppr超能文献

2008年及以后的阿尔茨海默病药物研发:问题与机遇

Alzheimer's disease drug development in 2008 and beyond: problems and opportunities.

作者信息

Becker Robert E, Greig Nigel H

机构信息

Drug Design & Development Section, Laboratory of Neurosciences, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Curr Alzheimer Res. 2008 Aug;5(4):346-57. doi: 10.2174/156720508785132299.

Abstract

Recently, a number of Alzheimer's disease (AD) multi-center clinical trials (CT) have failed to provide statistically significant evidence of drug efficacy. To test for possible design or execution flaws we analyzed in detail CTs for two failed drugs that were strongly supported by preclinical evidence and by proven CT AD efficacy for other drugs in their class. Studies of the failed commercial trials suggest that methodological flaws may contribute to the failures and that these flaws lurk within current drug development practices ready to impact other AD drug development [1]. To identify and counter risks we considered the relevance to AD drug development of the following factors: (1) effective dosing of the drug product, (2) reliable evaluations of research subjects, (3) effective implementation of quality controls over data at research sites, (4) resources for practitioners to effectively use CT results in patient care, (5) effective disease modeling, (6) effective research designs. New drugs currently under development for AD address a variety of specific mechanistic targets. Mechanistic targets provide AD drug development opportunities to escape from many of the factors that currently undermine AD clinical pharmacology, especially the problems of inaccuracy and imprecision associated with using rated outcomes. In this paper we conclude that many of the current problems encountered in AD drug development can be avoided by changing practices. Current problems with human errors in clinical trials make it difficult to differentiate drugs that fail to evidence efficacy from apparent failures due to Type II errors. This uncertainty and the lack of publication of negative data impede researchers' abilities to improve methodologies in clinical pharmacology and to develop a sound body of knowledge about drug actions. We consider the identification of molecular targets as offering further opportunities for overcoming current failures in drug development.

摘要

最近,多项阿尔茨海默病(AD)多中心临床试验(CT)未能提供具有统计学意义的药物疗效证据。为了检验可能存在的设计或执行缺陷,我们详细分析了两项失败药物的临床试验,这两种药物在临床前证据以及同类其他药物已证实的CT AD疗效方面都得到了有力支持。对失败的商业试验的研究表明,方法学缺陷可能导致试验失败,并且这些缺陷潜藏在当前的药物开发实践中,随时可能影响其他AD药物的开发[1]。为了识别和应对风险,我们考虑了以下因素与AD药物开发的相关性:(1)药品的有效剂量,(2)对研究对象的可靠评估,(3)在研究地点对数据进行有效质量控制的实施,(4)从业者在患者护理中有效利用CT结果的资源,(5)有效的疾病建模,(6)有效的研究设计。目前正在研发的AD新药针对多种特定的机制靶点。机制靶点为AD药物开发提供了机会,使其能够摆脱目前破坏AD临床药理学的许多因素,尤其是与使用评分结果相关的不准确和不精确问题。在本文中,我们得出结论,通过改变实践可以避免AD药物开发中目前遇到的许多问题。目前临床试验中人为错误导致的问题使得难以区分未能证明疗效的药物与因II型错误导致的明显失败。这种不确定性以及阴性数据缺乏发表阻碍了研究人员改进临床药理学方法和建立关于药物作用的可靠知识体系的能力。我们认为,分子靶点的识别为克服当前药物开发失败提供了进一步的机会。

相似文献

4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Increasing the success rate for Alzheimer's disease drug discovery and development.提高阿尔茨海默病药物研发成功率。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2012 Apr;7(4):367-70. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2012.672409. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
9

引用本文的文献

4
Neurotheranostics as personalized medicines.神经治疗学作为个性化药物。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019 Aug;148:252-289. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Down syndrome, beta-amyloid and neuroimaging.唐氏综合征、β-淀粉样蛋白与神经影像学。
Free Radic Biol Med. 2018 Jan;114:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
A new regulatory road-map for Alzheimer's disease drug development.阿尔茨海默病药物研发的新监管路线图。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014 Mar;11(3):215-20. doi: 10.2174/156720501103140329210642.

本文引用的文献

1
2
One hundred years after the discovery of Alzheimer's disease. A turning point for therapy?
J Alzheimers Dis. 2007 Aug;12(1):37-52. doi: 10.3233/jad-2007-12105.
4
Why do clinical trials fail?
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;27(4):420-1; author reply 421. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000280316.81366.23.
7
Phenserine.苯丝氨酸
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1087-97. doi: 10.1517/13543784.16.7.1087.
10
MCI treatment trials: failure or not?
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Jun;6(6):473-5. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70113-8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验