Suppr超能文献

在一家学术性急诊科,用于缓解疼痛的阿片类药物给药方面的种族差异。

Racial differences in opiate administration for pain relief at an academic emergency department.

作者信息

Dickason R Myles, Chauhan Vijai, Mor Astha, Ibler Erin, Kuehnle Sarah, Mahoney Daren, Armbrecht Eric, Dalawari Preeti

机构信息

New York Hospital Queens, Department of Emergency Medicine, Flushing, New York.

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):372-80. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.3.23893. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The decision to treat pain in the emergency department (ED) is a complex, idiosyncratic process. Prior studies have shown that EDs undertreat pain. Several studies demonstrate an association between analgesia administration and race. This is the first Midwest single institution study to address the question of race and analgesia, in addition to examining the effects of both patient and physician characteristics on race-based disparities in analgesia administration.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to an urban academic ED with an isolated diagnosis of back pain, migraine, or long bone fracture (LBF) from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Demographic and medication administration information was collected from patient charts by trained data collectors blinded to the hypothesis of the study. The primary outcome was the proportion of African-Americans who received analgesia and opiates, as compared to Caucasians, using Pearson's chi-squared test. We developed a multiple logistic regression model to identify which physician and patient characteristics correlated with increased opiate administration.

RESULTS

Of the 2,461 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 57% were African-American and 30% Caucasian (n=2136). There was no statistically significant racial difference in the administration of any analgesia (back pain: 86% vs. 86%, p=0.81; migraine: 83% vs. 73%, p=0.09; LBF: 94% vs. 90%, p=0.17), or in opiate administration for migraine or LBF. African-Americans who presented with back pain were less likely to receive an opiate than Caucasians (50% vs. 72%, p<0.001). Secondary outcomes showed that higher acuity, older age, physician training in emergency medicine, and male physicians were positively associated with opiate administration. Neither race nor gender patient-physician congruency correlated with opiate administration.

CONCLUSION

No race-based disparity in overall analgesia administration was noted for all three conditions: LBF, migraine, and back pain at this institution. A race-based disparity in the likelihood of receiving opiate analgesia for back pain was observed in this ED. The etiology of this is likely multifactorial, but understanding physician and patient characteristics of institutions may help to decrease the disparity by raising awareness of practice patterns and can provide the basis for quality improvement projects.

摘要

引言

在急诊科治疗疼痛的决策是一个复杂、因人而异的过程。先前的研究表明,急诊科对疼痛的治疗不足。多项研究表明镇痛药物的使用与种族之间存在关联。这是中西部地区首个单机构研究,旨在探讨种族与镇痛的问题,同时研究患者和医生特征对基于种族的镇痛药物使用差异的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性病历审查研究,研究对象为2007年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间因单纯性背痛、偏头痛或长骨骨折(LBF)就诊于一所城市学术性急诊科的患者。经过培训的数据收集人员从患者病历中收集人口统计学和用药信息,这些人员对研究假设不知情。主要结局是使用Pearson卡方检验比较非裔美国人与白种人接受镇痛药物和阿片类药物治疗的比例。我们建立了一个多元逻辑回归模型,以确定哪些医生和患者特征与阿片类药物使用增加相关。

结果

在符合纳入标准的2461例患者中,57%为非裔美国人,30%为白种人(n = 2136)。在任何一种镇痛药物的使用上(背痛:86%对86%,p = 0.81;偏头痛:83%对73%,p = 0.09;LBF:94%对90%,p = 0.17),以及偏头痛或LBF的阿片类药物使用上,均未发现统计学上显著的种族差异。因背痛就诊的非裔美国人比白种人更不可能接受阿片类药物治疗(50%对72%,p<0.001)。次要结局显示,病情严重程度更高、年龄更大、接受过急诊医学培训的医生以及男性医生与阿片类药物使用呈正相关。患者与医生的种族或性别匹配度均与阿片类药物使用无关。

结论

在本机构中,对于LBF、偏头痛和背痛这三种情况,在总体镇痛药物使用方面未发现基于种族的差异。在该急诊科观察到因背痛接受阿片类镇痛药物治疗的可能性存在基于种族的差异。其病因可能是多因素的,但了解机构中医生和患者的特征可能有助于通过提高对实践模式的认识来减少差异,并可为质量改进项目提供依据。

相似文献

6
Ethnicity and analgesic practice.种族与镇痛实践。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;35(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70099-0.

引用本文的文献

3
Opioid Prescribing Disparity in Traumatically Injured Patients.创伤性损伤患者的阿片类药物处方差异
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Jun 1;240(6):915-925. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001353. Epub 2025 May 14.
7
A critical view: Examining disparities regarding timely cholecystectomy.批判视角:胆囊切除术及时性差异研究
Surgery. 2024 Nov;176(5):1345-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

5
A multifaceted initiative to improve clinician awareness of pain management disparities.
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):388-96. doi: 10.1177/1062860613503897. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验