• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍患者的抗精神病药物治疗依从性及相关心理健康护理利用情况

Antipsychotic treatment adherence and associated mental health care use among individuals with bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Gianfrancesco Frank D, Sajatovic Martha, Rajagopalan Krithika, Wang Ruey-Hua

机构信息

HECON Associates, Inc., Montgomery Village, Maryland 20886, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2008 Jul;30(7):1358-74. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(08)80062-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(08)80062-8
PMID:18691997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 48% of patients with bipolar disorder are either nonadherent or partially adherent to antipsychotic drug treatment. Medication adherence may differ by bipolar disorder subtype.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the association between antipsychotic treatment adherence and mental health care use among individuals with bipolar disorder with predominantly manic/mixed symptoms or predominantly depressive symptoms.

METHODS

Individuals with bipolar or manic disorder who had at least 1 medical claim with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 296.4-296.8 (bipolar disorder) or 296.0 or 296.1 (manic disorder) were identified from medical and pharmacy claims in the PharMetrics database for the period from January 1999 through December 2004. Adherence was measured by intensity (medication possession ratio [MPR]) and treatment duration. The association between adherence and health care use during and after antipsychotic treatment was evaluated using multiple regression analysis. The traditional P < 0.05 threshold was used for statistical significance; however, results that approached significance at P < 0.10 were also noted.

RESULTS

Claims data were examined for 13,941 antipsychotic treatment episodes occurring in 12,952 individuals with bipolar or manic disorder. Of these, 6153 treatment episodes occurred in 5711 individuals with predominantly manic/mixed symptoms, and 2617 occurred in 2381 individuals with predominantly depressive symptoms. The remaining 5171 treatment episodes occurred in 4860 individuals with unspecified bipolar disorder and were not included in the analysis. In individuals with manic/mixed symptoms, a higher MPR was associated with reduced total and outpatient mental health expenditures over subsequent stages of treatment (reduction in total expenditure per 1-point increment in MPR: $123-$439; P < 0.001). In individuals with predominantly depressive symptoms, the association between MPR and subsequent mental health expenditure reached statistical significance only in months 10-12, the 3rd of the 4 treatment segments examined (total mental health expenditure: -$714 [P < 0.001]; outpatient mental health expenditure: -$468 [P < 0.001]). A higher MPR was also associated with a lower likelihood of acute mental health care (inpatient hospitalization or an emergency department visit) in subsequent months in individuals with manic/mixed symptoms or depressive symptoms (odds ratio = 0.545 [95% CI, 0.30- 1.00] and 0.395 [95% CI, 0.14-1.12], respectively; both NS at the P < 0.05 threshold), and was not associated with mental health inpatient days. In both subgroups, a longer duration of treatment was associated with lower total and outpatient mental health expenditures during the 4 months after the termination of treatment (both, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In these individuals with bipolar or manic disorder, improved adherence to antipsychotic treatment was associated with lower subsequent total and outpatient mental health care expenditures. This association was less pronounced in individuals with predominantly depressive symptoms than in those with predominantly manic/mixed symptoms.

摘要

背景

高达48%的双相情感障碍患者对抗精神病药物治疗不依从或部分依从。药物依从性可能因双相情感障碍亚型而异。

目的

本研究评估了以躁狂/混合症状为主或抑郁症状为主的双相情感障碍患者中,抗精神病药物治疗依从性与精神卫生保健利用之间的关联。

方法

从PharMetrics数据库1999年1月至2004年12月期间的医疗和药房理赔记录中,识别出患有双相情感障碍或躁狂症且至少有1次国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本编码为296.4 - 296.8(双相情感障碍)或296.0或296.1(躁狂症)的医疗理赔记录的个体。依从性通过强度(药物持有率[MPR])和治疗持续时间来衡量。使用多元回归分析评估抗精神病药物治疗期间及之后依从性与卫生保健利用之间的关联。采用传统的P < 0.05阈值判定统计学显著性;然而,P < 0.10且接近显著性的结果也予以记录。

结果

对12,952例双相情感障碍或躁狂症患者发生的13,941次抗精神病药物治疗事件的理赔数据进行了检查。其中,5711例以躁狂/混合症状为主的个体发生了6153次治疗事件,2381例以抑郁症状为主的个体发生了2617次治疗事件。其余5171次治疗事件发生在4860例未明确双相情感障碍的个体中,未纳入分析。在以躁狂/混合症状为主的个体中,较高的MPR与治疗后续阶段的总精神卫生支出和门诊精神卫生支出减少相关(MPR每增加1分,总支出减少:123美元 - 439美元;P < 0.001)。在以抑郁症状为主的个体中,MPR与后续精神卫生支出之间的关联仅在检查的4个治疗阶段中的第3个阶段,即第10 - 12个月达到统计学显著性(总精神卫生支出: - 714美元[P < 0.001];门诊精神卫生支出: - 468美元[P < 0.001])。较高的MPR还与以躁狂/混合症状或抑郁症状为主的个体在后续几个月中急性精神卫生保健(住院或急诊就诊)的可能性较低相关(优势比分别为0.545[95%置信区间,0.30 - 1.00]和0.395[95%置信区间,0.14 - 1.12];在P < 0.05阈值时均无统计学显著性),且与精神科住院天数无关。在两个亚组中,治疗持续时间较长与治疗终止后4个月内的总精神卫生支出和门诊精神卫生支出较低相关(均P < 0.01)。

结论

在这些双相情感障碍或躁狂症患者中,抗精神病药物治疗依从性的提高与后续较低的总精神卫生保健支出和门诊精神卫生保健支出相关。这种关联在以抑郁症状为主的个体中不如在以躁狂/混合症状为主的个体中明显。

相似文献

1
Antipsychotic treatment adherence and associated mental health care use among individuals with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者的抗精神病药物治疗依从性及相关心理健康护理利用情况
Clin Ther. 2008 Jul;30(7):1358-74. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(08)80062-8.
2
Association between antipsychotic combination therapy and treatment adherence among individuals with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者中抗精神病药物联合治疗与治疗依从性之间的关联。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-16.
3
Treatment adherence among patients with bipolar or manic disorder taking atypical and typical antipsychotics.服用非典型和典型抗精神病药物的双相情感障碍或躁狂症患者的治疗依从性。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;67(2):222-32. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0208.
4
The association between treatment adherence and antipsychotic dose among individuals with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者的治疗依从性与抗精神病药物剂量之间的关联。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Nov;23(6):305-16. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32830b0f88.
5
Risk of rehospitalization among bipolar disorder patients who are nonadherent to antipsychotic therapy after hospital discharge.出院后未坚持抗精神病药物治疗的双相情感障碍患者再次住院的风险。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Feb 15;66(4):358-65. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080374.
6
Clinical and economic consequences of medication non-adherence in the treatment of patients with a manic/mixed episode of bipolar disorder: results from the European Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication (EMBLEM) study.双相情感障碍躁狂/混合发作患者药物治疗不依从的临床和经济后果:来自欧洲双相情感障碍药物纵向评估研究(EMBLEM)的结果。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Nov 30;190(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 May 14.
7
Antipsychotic use at adult ambulatory care visits by patients with mental health disorders in the United States, 1996-2003: national estimates and associated factors.1996 - 2003年美国心理健康障碍患者在成人门诊护理就诊时的抗精神病药物使用情况:全国估计数及相关因素
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):723-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.017.
8
The relationship between antipsychotic medication adherence and patient outcomes among individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study.抗精神病药物依从性与双相情感障碍患者结局的关系:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 18;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-8-7.
9
Impact of formulary-related pharmacy claim rejections of cariprazine on health care utilization and treatment patterns among patients with bipolar I disorder.卡利拉嗪用药目录相关的配药拒绝对双相 I 障碍患者的医疗利用和治疗模式的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):118-128. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.118.
10
Comparing adherence to and persistence with antipsychotic therapy among patients with bipolar disorder.比较双相情感障碍患者抗精神病药物治疗的依从性和持续性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Nov;41(11):1812-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K205. Epub 2007 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Patterns of Utilization and Costs Associated with Second-Generation Oral Antipsychotic Medication for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Literature Review.第二代口服抗精神病药物治疗双相情感障碍的真实世界使用模式及成本:文献综述
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Feb 16;17:515-531. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S280051. eCollection 2021.
2
The Economic Burden of Bipolar Disorder in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review.美国双相情感障碍的经济负担:一项系统文献综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Sep 7;12:481-497. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S259338. eCollection 2020.
3
Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder.
双相情感障碍患者对心境稳定剂的依从性轨迹
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2019 Sep 4;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0154-z.
4
Peer support for mood disorder: Characteristics and benefits from attending the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance mutual-help organization.同伴支持治疗心境障碍:参加抑郁和双相障碍支持联盟互助组织的特点和益处。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Aug 1;255:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Efficacy of shared decision-making on treatment adherence of patients with bipolar disorder: a cluster randomized trial (ShareD-BD).共享决策对双相情感障碍患者治疗依从性的影响:一项集群随机试验(ShareD-BD)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1686-y.
6
Treatment-adherence in bipolar disorder: A patient-centred approach.双相情感障碍的治疗依从性:以患者为中心的方法。
World J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 22;6(4):399-409. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i4.399.
7
'Big data' in mental health research: current status and emerging possibilities.心理健康研究中的“大数据”:现状与新机遇
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;51(8):1055-72. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1266-8. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
Medication Adherence in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Comprehensive Review.双相情感障碍患者的药物依从性:一项综合综述。
CNS Drugs. 2016 Sep;30(9):819-35. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0368-x.
9
Cost-of-illness studies for bipolar disorder: systematic review of international studies.双相情感障碍的疾病成本研究:国际研究的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Apr;33(4):341-53. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0250-y.
10
Association between therapeutic alliance, care satisfaction, and pharmacological adherence in bipolar disorder.双相障碍中治疗联盟、护理满意度和药物依从性之间的关系。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jun;33(3):343-50. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182900c6f.