• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定改善心脏手术的方法:一种在组织层面实施的手术方法和策略。

Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level.

作者信息

ElBardissi Andrew W, Wiegmann Douglas A, Henrickson Sarah, Wadhera Rishi, Sundt Thoralf M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007
PMID:18692399
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has found teamwork failures to be strongly associated with the occurrence of surgical error. There have been few efforts to prospectively collect data regarding teamwork failures and technical errors in order to create interventions that would maximize teamwork effectiveness thereby minimizing technical error.

METHODS

Thirty-one cardiac surgical cases were prospectively observed by a trained human factors observer. Events were characterized according to human factors theory and included teamwork failures and technical errors. Surgical team structure was also evaluated in an effort to identify if it had an impact on surgical team performance.

RESULTS

A strong correlation (r=0.67, p<0.001) was recognized between the occurrence of technical error (n=155) and teamwork failures (n=178). Teamwork failures consisted of surgeon-technical team failures (n=90, 51%), procedural information failures (n=36, 20%), surgeon-anesthesiologist failures (n=27, 15%), surgeon-perfusionist failures (n=18, 10%), and failures due to handoffs (n=7, 4%). Teams made up of members that were familiar with the operating surgeon had significantly fewer total event failures (8.6+/-1.6 vs 22+/-3.1, p<0.0001) and teamwork failures (5.6+/-1.8 vs 15.4+/-1.9, p<0.0001) in comparison to those teams where the majority of members were unfamiliar with the operating surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the process of cardiac surgery would benefit from interventions to improve teamwork and communication. Such interventions could include preoperative briefings, revised approach to structuring of operative teams to favor members that have gained familiarity with the operating surgeon, standardized communication practices, and postoperative debriefings.

摘要

背景

先前的研究发现团队协作失误与手术失误的发生密切相关。为了制定能最大限度提高团队协作效率从而减少技术失误的干预措施,前瞻性收集有关团队协作失误和技术失误数据的工作开展较少。

方法

由一名经过培训的人为因素观察员对31例心脏外科手术病例进行前瞻性观察。根据人为因素理论对事件进行分类,包括团队协作失误和技术失误。同时评估手术团队结构,以确定其是否对手术团队表现有影响。

结果

技术失误(n = 155)的发生与团队协作失误(n = 178)之间存在强相关性(r = 0.67,p < 0.001)。团队协作失误包括外科医生与技术团队失误(n = 90,51%)、程序信息失误(n = 36,20%)、外科医生与麻醉医生失误(n = 27,15%)、外科医生与灌注师失误(n = 18,10%)以及交接失误(n = 7,4%)。与大多数成员不熟悉主刀医生的团队相比,由熟悉主刀医生的成员组成的团队总事件失误(8.6±1.6对22±3.1,p < 0.0001)和团队协作失误(5.6±1.8对15.4±1.9,p < 0.0001)明显更少。

结论

这些结果表明,心脏外科手术过程将受益于改善团队协作和沟通的干预措施。此类干预措施可包括术前简报、调整手术团队结构以使成员更熟悉主刀医生、标准化沟通做法以及术后总结汇报。

相似文献

1
Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level.确定改善心脏手术的方法:一种在组织层面实施的手术方法和策略。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
2
Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles.手术室中的团队合作与失误:技能与角色分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):699-706. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8.
3
Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions, and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams.错误与错误负担:儿科心脏手术团队中的态度、认知及安全文化
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.024.
4
Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.手术室中的沟通失误:复发性类型及影响的观察性分类
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.
5
Characterization of non-technical skills in paediatric cardiac surgery: communication patterns.儿科心脏外科学中非技术技能的特征:沟通模式。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):1005-12; discussion 1012. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs068. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
6
Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation.手术流程中断及其与手术失误的关系:一项探索性调查。
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.034.
7
An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study.手术护理连续体中信息传递的评估:一项可行性研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):402-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e986df.
8
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement.手术中的观察性团队评估:内容验证和工具改进。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):234-243.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.001.
9
Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations.通过识别成功手术中的潜在失误来提高患者安全。
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.01.033.
10
An observational analysis of surgical team compliance with perioperative safety practices after crew resource management training.对手术团队在机组资源管理培训后遵守围手术期安全规范情况的观察性分析。
Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.012.

引用本文的文献

1
The surgical time-out: the relationship between perceptions of a safety-task anchor and surgical team workflow.手术暂停:安全任务锚定认知与手术团队工作流程之间的关系。
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02789-w.
2
The influence of familiarity between the surgeon and their assistant on patient outcomes: a prospective observational cohort study.外科医生与其助手之间的熟悉程度对患者治疗结果的影响:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2525-2534. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002269.
3
Impact of sleep deficiency on surgical performance: a prospective assessment.
睡眠不足对手术表现的影响:前瞻性评估。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Apr 1;19(4):673-683. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10406.
4
Red Out: Bleeding During Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and Strategies To Manage It.《红色警报:机器人腹膜后淋巴结清扫术中的出血及处理策略》
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jan 4;48:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.003. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Staffing, teamwork and scope of practice: Analysis of the association with patient safety in the context of rehabilitation.人员配备、团队合作和执业范围:康复背景下与患者安全关联的分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jul;78(7):2015-2029. doi: 10.1111/jan.15112. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
6
How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队合作究竟有多有效?医疗团队中团队合作与绩效之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e028280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280.
7
Six-year single-centre experience in minimally invasive mitral valve repair - impact of the team learning curve on in-hospital clinical outcome.六年单中心微创二尖瓣修复经验——团队学习曲线对院内临床结局的影响
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2019 Mar;16(1):27-31. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2019.83942. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Familiarity and Communication in the Operating Room.手术室中的熟悉与沟通。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.079. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Factors defining expertise in screening colonoscopy.定义结肠镜筛查专业技能的因素。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E931-E938. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113561. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的手术流程中断
Can J Urol. 2017 Jun;24(3):8814-8821.