ElBardissi Andrew W, Wiegmann Douglas A, Henrickson Sarah, Wadhera Rishi, Sundt Thoralf M
Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
Previous research has found teamwork failures to be strongly associated with the occurrence of surgical error. There have been few efforts to prospectively collect data regarding teamwork failures and technical errors in order to create interventions that would maximize teamwork effectiveness thereby minimizing technical error.
Thirty-one cardiac surgical cases were prospectively observed by a trained human factors observer. Events were characterized according to human factors theory and included teamwork failures and technical errors. Surgical team structure was also evaluated in an effort to identify if it had an impact on surgical team performance.
A strong correlation (r=0.67, p<0.001) was recognized between the occurrence of technical error (n=155) and teamwork failures (n=178). Teamwork failures consisted of surgeon-technical team failures (n=90, 51%), procedural information failures (n=36, 20%), surgeon-anesthesiologist failures (n=27, 15%), surgeon-perfusionist failures (n=18, 10%), and failures due to handoffs (n=7, 4%). Teams made up of members that were familiar with the operating surgeon had significantly fewer total event failures (8.6+/-1.6 vs 22+/-3.1, p<0.0001) and teamwork failures (5.6+/-1.8 vs 15.4+/-1.9, p<0.0001) in comparison to those teams where the majority of members were unfamiliar with the operating surgeon.
These results indicate that the process of cardiac surgery would benefit from interventions to improve teamwork and communication. Such interventions could include preoperative briefings, revised approach to structuring of operative teams to favor members that have gained familiarity with the operating surgeon, standardized communication practices, and postoperative debriefings.
先前的研究发现团队协作失误与手术失误的发生密切相关。为了制定能最大限度提高团队协作效率从而减少技术失误的干预措施,前瞻性收集有关团队协作失误和技术失误数据的工作开展较少。
由一名经过培训的人为因素观察员对31例心脏外科手术病例进行前瞻性观察。根据人为因素理论对事件进行分类,包括团队协作失误和技术失误。同时评估手术团队结构,以确定其是否对手术团队表现有影响。
技术失误(n = 155)的发生与团队协作失误(n = 178)之间存在强相关性(r = 0.67,p < 0.001)。团队协作失误包括外科医生与技术团队失误(n = 90,51%)、程序信息失误(n = 36,20%)、外科医生与麻醉医生失误(n = 27,15%)、外科医生与灌注师失误(n = 18,10%)以及交接失误(n = 7,4%)。与大多数成员不熟悉主刀医生的团队相比,由熟悉主刀医生的成员组成的团队总事件失误(8.6±1.6对22±3.1,p < 0.0001)和团队协作失误(5.6±1.8对15.4±1.9,p < 0.0001)明显更少。
这些结果表明,心脏外科手术过程将受益于改善团队协作和沟通的干预措施。此类干预措施可包括术前简报、调整手术团队结构以使成员更熟悉主刀医生、标准化沟通做法以及术后总结汇报。