• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.手术室中的沟通失误:复发性类型及影响的观察性分类
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.
2
A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room.一项关于手术室患者安全的前瞻性研究。
Surgery. 2006 Feb;139(2):159-73. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.037.
3
Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR.促使团队进行沟通:一份促进手术室跨专业沟通的检查表的开发与试点实施
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):340-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012377.
4
Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level.确定改善心脏手术的方法:一种在组织层面实施的手术方法和策略。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
5
A theory-based instrument to evaluate team communication in the operating room: balancing measurement authenticity and reliability.一种基于理论的评估手术室团队沟通的工具:平衡测量的真实性和可靠性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15(6):422-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015388.
6
Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training.通过医疗团队培训弥合手术室中的沟通差距。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):770-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.018.
7
Deconstructing intraoperative communication failures.剖析术中沟通失败。
J Surg Res. 2012 Sep;177(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles.手术室中的团队合作与失误:技能与角色分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):699-706. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8.
9
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.
10
National push for surgical safety checklist under way.全国范围内推动手术安全检查表的工作正在进行中。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2009 May;34(5):53-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a Graft Arrival Time Estimation Formula Decreases Operation Time in Transplantation From Deceased Donor.使用移植物到达时间估计公式可减少来自已故供体的移植手术时间。
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Aug 4;40(30):e175. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e175.
2
The Impact of Personalised Surgical Caps on Teamwork and Communication in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.个性化手术帽对手术室团队协作与沟通的影响:一项系统综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;8(8):e71035. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71035. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Allied health professionals' experiences of co-worker unprofessional behaviour and their reported speaking-up skills: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey.联合健康专业人员对同事不专业行为的经历及其所报告的发声技巧:一项横断面调查的二次分析
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jun 6;12(3):100262. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100262. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
The effects of temporary staff on observable teamwork outcomes within operating rooms.临时工作人员对手术室中可观察到的团队协作成果的影响。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 10;5:1514431. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1514431. eCollection 2025.
5
The Orthopaedic Instrumentation Nomenclature Know-how (OINK) study.骨科器械命名知识(OINK)研究
J Orthop. 2025 May 19;66:188-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.021. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Impact of temporary nursing staff on communication patterns: an observation study during daily nurse huddles.临时护理人员对沟通模式的影响:日常护士碰头会期间的一项观察性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003242. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003242.
7
Development and implementation of paging and escalation guidelines to improve interprofessional communication on surgical units.制定和实施传呼与升级指南,以改善外科病房的跨专业沟通。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 6;14(2):e002995. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002995.
8
Communication failures and racial disparities in inpatient maternity care: a qualitative content analysis of incident reports.住院产妇护理中的沟通失误与种族差异:对事件报告的定性内容分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 6;14(1):e003112. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003112.
9
Misidentification of Medical Devices With Radiographic Contrast Functions As Retained Foreign Bodies on Postoperative Radiographs: A Report of Two Cases.术后X光片上具有放射造影功能的医疗器械被误认作残留异物:两例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jan 28;17(1):e78154. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78154. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Variability and gaps in teamwork assessment tools for health care teams in health professions education: A scoping review.卫生专业教育中医疗团队合作评估工具的变异性与差距:一项范围综述
Med Educ. 2025 Sep;59(9):910-923. doi: 10.1111/medu.15620. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Forming professional identities on the health care team: discursive constructions of the 'other' in the operating room.在医疗团队中塑造职业身份:手术室里对“他者”的话语建构
Med Educ. 2002 Aug;36(8):728-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01271.x.
2
Leadership and the quality of care.领导力与医疗质量。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii3-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100003...
3
Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training.通过团队培训在复杂环境中加强团队协作。
Group Dyn. 1997 Jun;1(2):169-82.
4
Multidisciplinary teamwork: the good, bad, and everything in between.多学科团队合作:好的方面、不好的方面以及其间的所有情况。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):65-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.65.
5
On error management: lessons from aviation.论错误管理:来自航空领域的经验教训。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781.
6
The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. The MedTeams Research Consortium.改善团队合作以减少急诊科医疗差错的潜力。MedTeams研究联盟。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):373-83. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70134-4.
7
Teaching and learning communication in medicine: a rhetorical approach.
Acad Med. 1999 May;74(5):507-10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199905000-00015.

手术室中的沟通失误:复发性类型及影响的观察性分类

Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.

作者信息

Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker G R, Reznick R, Bohnen J, Orser B, Doran D, Grober E

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.13.5.330
PMID:15465935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ineffective team communication is frequently at the root of medical error. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of communication failures in the operating room (OR) and to classify their effects. This study was part of a larger project to develop a team checklist to improve communication in the OR.

METHODS

Trained observers recorded 90 hours of observation during 48 surgical procedures. Ninety four team members participated from anesthesia (16 staff, 6 fellows, 3 residents), surgery (14 staff, 8 fellows, 13 residents, 3 clerks), and nursing (31 staff). Field notes recording procedurally relevant communication events were analysed using a framework which considered the content, audience, purpose, and occasion of a communication exchange. A communication failure was defined as an event that was flawed in one or more of these dimensions.

RESULTS

421 communication events were noted, of which 129 were categorized as communication failures. Failure types included "occasion" (45.7% of instances) where timing was poor; "content" (35.7%) where information was missing or inaccurate, "purpose" (24.0%) where issues were not resolved, and "audience" (20.9%) where key individuals were excluded. 36.4% of failures resulted in visible effects on system processes including inefficiency, team tension, resource waste, workaround, delay, patient inconvenience and procedural error.

CONCLUSION

Communication failures in the OR exhibited a common set of problems. They occurred in approximately 30% of team exchanges and a third of these resulted in effects which jeopardized patient safety by increasing cognitive load, interrupting routine, and increasing tension in the OR.

摘要

背景

无效的团队沟通常常是医疗差错的根源。本研究的目的是描述手术室(OR)中沟通失败的特征,并对其影响进行分类。本研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发一个团队检查表以改善手术室中的沟通。

方法

经过培训的观察员在48台外科手术过程中记录了90小时的观察情况。94名团队成员参与其中,包括麻醉科(16名工作人员、6名研究员、3名住院医师)、外科(14名工作人员、8名研究员、13名住院医师、3名办事员)和护理人员(31名工作人员)。使用一个考虑沟通交流的内容、受众、目的和场合的框架,对记录程序相关沟通事件的现场笔记进行分析。沟通失败被定义为在这些维度中的一个或多个方面存在缺陷的事件。

结果

记录了421次沟通事件,其中129次被归类为沟通失败。失败类型包括:“场合”(占事件的45.7%),即时间安排不佳;“内容”(35.7%),即信息缺失或不准确;“目的”(24.0%),即问题未得到解决;“受众”(20.9%),即关键人员被排除在外。36.4%的失败对系统流程产生了明显影响,包括效率低下、团队紧张、资源浪费、临时解决办法、延误、患者不便和程序错误。

结论

手术室中的沟通失败表现出一系列常见问题。它们发生在大约30%的团队交流中,其中三分之一的沟通失败通过增加认知负荷、打断常规操作和加剧手术室紧张氛围,对患者安全产生了危及作用。