Suppr超能文献

手术室中的沟通失误:复发性类型及影响的观察性分类

Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.

作者信息

Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker G R, Reznick R, Bohnen J, Orser B, Doran D, Grober E

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ineffective team communication is frequently at the root of medical error. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of communication failures in the operating room (OR) and to classify their effects. This study was part of a larger project to develop a team checklist to improve communication in the OR.

METHODS

Trained observers recorded 90 hours of observation during 48 surgical procedures. Ninety four team members participated from anesthesia (16 staff, 6 fellows, 3 residents), surgery (14 staff, 8 fellows, 13 residents, 3 clerks), and nursing (31 staff). Field notes recording procedurally relevant communication events were analysed using a framework which considered the content, audience, purpose, and occasion of a communication exchange. A communication failure was defined as an event that was flawed in one or more of these dimensions.

RESULTS

421 communication events were noted, of which 129 were categorized as communication failures. Failure types included "occasion" (45.7% of instances) where timing was poor; "content" (35.7%) where information was missing or inaccurate, "purpose" (24.0%) where issues were not resolved, and "audience" (20.9%) where key individuals were excluded. 36.4% of failures resulted in visible effects on system processes including inefficiency, team tension, resource waste, workaround, delay, patient inconvenience and procedural error.

CONCLUSION

Communication failures in the OR exhibited a common set of problems. They occurred in approximately 30% of team exchanges and a third of these resulted in effects which jeopardized patient safety by increasing cognitive load, interrupting routine, and increasing tension in the OR.

摘要

背景

无效的团队沟通常常是医疗差错的根源。本研究的目的是描述手术室(OR)中沟通失败的特征,并对其影响进行分类。本研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发一个团队检查表以改善手术室中的沟通。

方法

经过培训的观察员在48台外科手术过程中记录了90小时的观察情况。94名团队成员参与其中,包括麻醉科(16名工作人员、6名研究员、3名住院医师)、外科(14名工作人员、8名研究员、13名住院医师、3名办事员)和护理人员(31名工作人员)。使用一个考虑沟通交流的内容、受众、目的和场合的框架,对记录程序相关沟通事件的现场笔记进行分析。沟通失败被定义为在这些维度中的一个或多个方面存在缺陷的事件。

结果

记录了421次沟通事件,其中129次被归类为沟通失败。失败类型包括:“场合”(占事件的45.7%),即时间安排不佳;“内容”(35.7%),即信息缺失或不准确;“目的”(24.0%),即问题未得到解决;“受众”(20.9%),即关键人员被排除在外。36.4%的失败对系统流程产生了明显影响,包括效率低下、团队紧张、资源浪费、临时解决办法、延误、患者不便和程序错误。

结论

手术室中的沟通失败表现出一系列常见问题。它们发生在大约30%的团队交流中,其中三分之一的沟通失败通过增加认知负荷、打断常规操作和加剧手术室紧张氛围,对患者安全产生了危及作用。

相似文献

7
Deconstructing intraoperative communication failures.剖析术中沟通失败。
J Surg Res. 2012 Sep;177(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 May 4.
9
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.

引用本文的文献

5
The Orthopaedic Instrumentation Nomenclature Know-how (OINK) study.骨科器械命名知识(OINK)研究
J Orthop. 2025 May 19;66:188-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.021. eCollection 2025 Aug.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验