Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮耐药性室性心动过速患者联合使用普罗帕酮的情况。

The use of associated propafenone in patients with amiodarone-resistant ventricular tachycardia.

作者信息

Morgera T, Dreas L, Humar F, Maras P, Chersevani D, Camerini F

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 1991 May;31(2):187-97. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90215-b.

Abstract

To clarify the risk-benefit ratio involved in association of antiarrhythmic drugs, a combined therapy of amiodarone and propafenone was tested by means of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, analysis of levels of the drug in the plasma and programmed electrical stimulation in a selected group of 10 patients who had left ventricular dysfunction and spontaneous relapses of sustained ventricular tachycardia despite treatment with amiodarone. Induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia, possible in each case during treatment with amiodarone, was suppressed after addition of propafenone in 2 patients (responders), who had the best ejection fractions of the entire group (greater than 45%). Worsening of spontaneous tachycardias developed in 4 cases during the combined therapy. These ventricular arrhythmias, although generally at a low rate, sometimes had the potential to degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and disappeared after both discontinuation of propafenone or increase of its dosage (1 patient). Of the six cases undergoing chronic combined treatment, only the responders to premature electrical stimulation were completely protected from recurrences of arrhythmia. Three cases, on the other hand, needed permanent endocardial pacing for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. The combination of treatment with amiodarone and propafenone, although potentially useful in limiting dosages of and toxicity from amiodarone, is frequently associated with undesirable, and occasionally has severe, side-effects. The best candidates for this pharmacological association seem to be patients without severely depressed left ventricular function who have a greater probability of not presenting the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia after the addition of propafenone to the regimen for treatment.

摘要

为阐明抗心律失常药物联合应用时的风险效益比,对10例左心室功能不全且尽管接受胺碘酮治疗仍有持续性室性心动过速自发复发的患者进行了连续心电图监测、血浆药物水平分析及程控电刺激,以此测试胺碘酮与普罗帕酮的联合治疗效果。在接受胺碘酮治疗的每例患者中均有可能诱发持续性室性心动过速,在加用普罗帕酮后,2例患者(反应者)的持续性室性心动过速得到抑制,这2例患者在全组中射血分数最佳(大于45%)。联合治疗期间有4例患者的自发心动过速恶化。这些室性心律失常虽然通常发生率较低,但有时有可能恶化为心室颤动,在停用普罗帕酮或增加其剂量后消失(1例患者)。在接受慢性联合治疗的6例患者中,只有对过早电刺激有反应者完全避免了心律失常复发。另一方面,有3例患者因症状性缓慢性心律失常需要永久性心内膜起搏。胺碘酮与普罗帕酮联合治疗虽然可能有助于限制胺碘酮的剂量和毒性,但常伴有不良副作用,偶尔还会出现严重副作用。这种药物联合治疗的最佳候选者似乎是左心室功能未严重受损的患者,这些患者在治疗方案中加用普罗帕酮后出现室性心动过速诱发性的可能性较小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验