Dückers Michel L A, Wagner Cordula, Groenewegen Peter P
NIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 11;8:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-172.
In quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) teams of practitioners from different health care organizations are brought together to systematically improve an aspect of patient care. Teams take part in a series of meetings to learn about relevant best practices, quality methods and change ideas, and share experiences in making changes in their own local setting. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for measuring team organization, external change agent support and support from the team's home institution in a Dutch national improvement and dissemination programme for hospitals based on several QICs.
The exploratory methodological design included two phases: a) content development and assessment, resulting in an instrument with 15 items, and b) field testing (N = 165). Internal consistency reliability was tested via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Principal component analyses were used to identify underlying constructs. Tests of scaling assumptions according to the multi trait/multi-item matrix, were used to confirm the component structure.
Three components were revealed, explaining 65% of the variability. The components were labelled 'organizational support', 'team organization' and 'external change agent support'. One item not meeting item-scale criteria was removed. This resulted in a 14 item instrument. Scale reliability ranged from 0.77 to 0.91. Internal item consistency and divergent validity were satisfactory.
On the whole, the instrument appears to be a promising tool for assessing team organization and internal and external support during QIC implementation. The psychometric properties were good and warrant application of the instrument for the evaluation of the national programme and similar improvement programmes.
在质量改进协作项目(QICs)中,来自不同医疗保健机构的从业者团队聚集在一起,以系统地改进患者护理的某个方面。团队参加一系列会议,了解相关的最佳实践、质量方法和变革理念,并分享在本地环境中进行变革的经验。本研究的目的是开发一种工具,用于在基于多个QICs的荷兰医院全国性改进与传播计划中,测量团队组织、外部变革推动者的支持以及团队所属机构的支持。
探索性方法设计包括两个阶段:a)内容开发与评估,形成一个包含15个条目的工具;b)现场测试(N = 165)。通过克朗巴赫α系数测试内部一致性信度。使用主成分分析来识别潜在结构。根据多特质/多项目矩阵进行的量表假设检验,用于确认成分结构。
揭示了三个成分,解释了65%的变异性。这些成分被标记为“组织支持”、“团队组织”和“外部变革推动者支持”。删除了一个不符合项目量表标准的条目。这产生了一个包含14个条目的工具。量表信度范围为0.77至0.91。内部项目一致性和区分效度令人满意。
总体而言,该工具似乎是评估QIC实施过程中团队组织以及内部和外部支持的一个有前景的工具。其心理测量特性良好,值得将该工具应用于国家计划和类似改进计划的评估。