• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解情境与实施中的复杂性:复杂干预措施的情境与实施(CICI)框架

Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.

作者信息

Pfadenhauer Lisa M, Gerhardus Ansgar, Mozygemba Kati, Lysdahl Kristin Bakke, Booth Andrew, Hofmann Bjørn, Wahlster Philip, Polus Stephanie, Burns Jacob, Brereton Louise, Rehfuess Eva

机构信息

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5
PMID:28202031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5312531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of complex interventions, as well as their success in reaching relevant populations, is critically influenced by their implementation in a given context. Current conceptual frameworks often fail to address context and implementation in an integrated way and, where addressed, they tend to focus on organisational context and are mostly concerned with specific health fields. Our objective was to develop a framework to facilitate the structured and comprehensive conceptualisation and assessment of context and implementation of complex interventions.

METHODS

The Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework was developed in an iterative manner and underwent extensive application. An initial framework based on a scoping review was tested in rapid assessments, revealing inconsistencies with respect to the underlying concepts. Thus, pragmatic utility concept analysis was undertaken to advance the concepts of context and implementation. Based on these findings, the framework was revised and applied in several systematic reviews, one health technology assessment (HTA) and one applicability assessment of very different complex interventions. Lessons learnt from these applications and from peer review were incorporated, resulting in the CICI framework.

RESULTS

The CICI framework comprises three dimensions-context, implementation and setting-which interact with one another and with the intervention dimension. Context comprises seven domains (i.e., geographical, epidemiological, socio-cultural, socio-economic, ethical, legal, political); implementation consists of five domains (i.e., implementation theory, process, strategies, agents and outcomes); setting refers to the specific physical location, in which the intervention is put into practise. The intervention and the way it is implemented in a given setting and context can occur on a micro, meso and macro level. Tools to operationalise the framework comprise a checklist, data extraction tools for qualitative and quantitative reviews and a consultation guide for applicability assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The CICI framework addresses and graphically presents context, implementation and setting in an integrated way. It aims at simplifying and structuring complexity in order to advance our understanding of whether and how interventions work. The framework can be applied in systematic reviews and HTA as well as primary research and facilitate communication among teams of researchers and with various stakeholders.

摘要

背景

复杂干预措施的有效性及其在覆盖相关人群方面的成功程度,在很大程度上受到其在特定环境中实施情况的影响。当前的概念框架往往未能以综合的方式处理环境和实施问题,即便有所涉及,也往往侧重于组织环境,且大多关注特定的健康领域。我们的目标是开发一个框架,以促进对复杂干预措施的环境和实施进行结构化和全面的概念化及评估。

方法

复杂干预措施的环境与实施(CICI)框架是以迭代方式开发的,并经过了广泛应用。基于范围审查的初始框架在快速评估中进行了测试,结果发现其在基本概念方面存在不一致之处。因此,开展了实用效用概念分析,以推进环境和实施的概念。基于这些发现,对框架进行了修订,并应用于多项系统评价、一项卫生技术评估(HTA)以及一项对截然不同的复杂干预措施的适用性评估。从这些应用以及同行评审中吸取的经验教训被纳入其中,从而形成了CICI框架。

结果

CICI框架包含三个维度——环境、实施和背景——它们相互作用,并与干预维度相互影响。环境包括七个领域(即地理、流行病学、社会文化、社会经济、伦理、法律、政治);实施由五个领域组成(即实施理论、过程、策略、实施者和结果);背景是指干预措施实际实施的具体物理场所。干预措施及其在给定背景和环境中的实施方式可以在微观、中观和宏观层面上发生。使该框架可操作化的工具包括一份清单、用于定性和定量评价的数据提取工具以及一份适用性评估的咨询指南。

结论

CICI框架以综合的方式处理并以图表形式呈现环境、实施和背景。它旨在简化和构建复杂性,以增进我们对干预措施是否有效以及如何有效的理解。该框架可应用于系统评价和HTA以及初级研究,并有助于研究团队之间以及与各利益相关者的沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af9/5312531/275b1e4d76de/13012_2017_552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af9/5312531/61d5c47df9ae/13012_2017_552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af9/5312531/275b1e4d76de/13012_2017_552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af9/5312531/61d5c47df9ae/13012_2017_552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af9/5312531/275b1e4d76de/13012_2017_552_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.理解情境与实施中的复杂性:复杂干预措施的情境与实施(CICI)框架
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5.
2
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The International Advanced Practice Nurse Integration Policy Intervention Taxonomy: A 10-Country Nominal Group Consensus Technique Study.国际高级实践护士整合政策干预分类法:一项10国名义群体共识技术研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70096. doi: 10.1111/inr.70096.
2
Mapping the path to domestic surrogacy: Identifying key facilitators and barriers in the Netherlands.探寻国内代孕之路:识别荷兰的关键促进因素与障碍
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0328469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328469. eCollection 2025.
3
Enhancing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research trial leadership and participation: insights from the initial stages of the Australian Fans in Training Project in the Northern Territory of Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health.减少环境细颗粒物空气污染的干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD010919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010919.pub2.
2
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.一个用于评估基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中健康公平促进情况的概念框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Implementation, context and complexity.
加强原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民在研究试验中的领导力与参与度:来自澳大利亚北领地“球迷训练项目”初始阶段的见解
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):e095720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095720.
4
Suicide prevention starts before the crisis: intervention guidelines for university students.自杀预防始于危机之前:大学生干预指南。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Jul 18;38(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00357-y.
5
Interaction of contextual, setting and implementation factors on a podoconiosis intervention in Rural Ethiopia: Results from a qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚农村地区地方性下肢水肿病干预措施中情境、环境与实施因素的相互作用:一项定性研究的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0328237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328237. eCollection 2025.
6
Successful Oral Health Interventions for Children Living in Vulnerable Circumstances - A Scoping Review.针对生活在弱势环境中的儿童的成功口腔健康干预措施——一项范围综述
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug;75(4):100855. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100855. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
7
[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].[实施研究的现状、分类及实施潜力:德国公共卫生领域清单]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04077-7.
8
Barriers and facilitators to scale-up of hospital-at-home: an observational cohort study protocol.扩大居家医院服务的障碍与促进因素:一项观察性队列研究方案
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 6;5:1571090. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1571090. eCollection 2025.
9
[Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].[关于实施基于人群的非传染性疾病预防措施的思考]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04078-6.
10
Re-conceptualizing implementation outcomes of health innovations as modes or attributes: an integrated framework.将健康创新的实施成果重新概念化为模式或属性:一个综合框架。
Front Health Serv. 2025 May 22;5:1373429. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1373429. eCollection 2025.
实施、背景与复杂性
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3.
4
Series: Clinical Epidemiology in South Africa. Paper 3: Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments.系列:南非临床流行病学。第 3 篇论文:逻辑模型有助于理解系统评价和卫生技术评估中的复杂性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
An approach for setting evidence-based and stakeholder-informed research priorities in low- and middle-income countries.一种在低收入和中等收入国家确定基于证据且兼顾利益相关者意见的研究重点的方法。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Apr 1;94(4):297-305. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.162966. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure to lead through consumer products and drinking water: A systematic review.通过消费品和饮用水减少铅暴露的干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Environ Res. 2016 May;147:525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
8
Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity.背景与实施:迈向概念成熟的概念分析
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(2):103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2).医疗保健中复杂干预措施的开发与评估报告标准:修订指南(CReDECI 2)
Trials. 2015 May 3;16:204. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0709-y.
10
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.