Suppr超能文献

养老院护理助理劳动力发展干预措施的混合方法评估:以“提升一步”(WIN A STEP UP)为例。

A mixed-method evaluation of a workforce development intervention for nursing assistants in nursing homes: the case of WIN A STEP UP.

作者信息

Morgan Jennifer Craft, Konrad Thomas R

机构信息

University of North Carolina Institute on Aging, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2008 Jul;48 Spec No 1:71-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.supplement_1.71.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate WIN A STEP UP, a workforce development program for nursing assistants (NAs) in nursing homes (NHs) involving continuing education by onsite trainers, compensation for education modules, supervisory skills training of frontline supervisors, and short-term retention contracts for bonuses and/or wage increases upon completion.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We collected longitudinal semistructured interview and survey data from NAs, supervisors, and managers at 8 program NHs and 10 comparison NHs. To control for selection bias, we matched 77 NA program participants to 81 participating site and 135 comparison site controls using propensity scores in a quasi-experimental design supplemented by qualitative assessments.

RESULTS

Managers at seven of eight participating NHs wanted to repeat the program. At 3 months after baseline, participants differed from controls by having (a) more improved nursing care and supportive leadership scores, (b) greater improvement in team care, and (c) stronger ratings of career and financial rewards. Nurse supervisors participating in supervisory skills training reported positive changes in management practices for themselves and peers. Modest 3-month turnover reductions occurred in six settings where the program was fully implemented without incident.

IMPLICATIONS

Managers', supervisors', and participating NAs' consistent perceptions of improved quality of care and job quality, along with a promise of increased retention, suggest that interventions like WIN A STEP UP are beneficial.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估“迈向新台阶”项目,这是一项针对养老院护理助理的劳动力发展项目,包括由现场培训师提供继续教育、对教育模块给予补偿、对一线主管进行监督技能培训,以及签订短期留用合同以在完成培训后给予奖金和/或加薪。

设计与方法

我们从8个参与项目的养老院和10个对照养老院的护理助理、主管和经理处收集了纵向半结构化访谈和调查数据。为控制选择偏差,我们采用倾向得分在准实验设计中,将77名参与项目的护理助理与81名参与项目的场所对照和135名对照场所对照进行匹配,并辅以定性评估。

结果

8个参与项目的养老院中有7个的经理希望重复该项目。在基线后3个月,参与者与对照组的差异在于:(a)护理和支持性领导得分有更大改善;(b)团队护理有更大改善;(c)职业和经济回报评分更高。参与监督技能培训的护士主管报告称,他们自己和同行的管理实践有积极变化。在6个全面实施该项目且无事故发生的场所,3个月的人员流动率略有下降。

启示

经理、主管和参与项目的护理助理对护理质量和工作质量改善的一致看法,以及提高留用率的承诺,表明像“迈向新台阶”这样的干预措施是有益的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验