Boyer Patrick J, Massimini Daniel F, Gill Thomas J, Papannagari Ramprasad, Stewart Susan L, Warner Jon P, Li Guoan
Bioengineering Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, GRJ-1215, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
J Orthop Sci. 2008 Jul;13(4):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s00776-008-1237-3. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Little is known about normal in vivo mechanics of the glenohumeral joint. Such an understanding would have significant implications for treating disease conditions that disrupt shoulder function. The objective of this study was to determine articular contact locations between the glenoid and humeral articular surfaces in normal subjects during shoulder abduction with neutral, internal, and external rotations. We hypothesized that glenohumeral articular contact is not perfectly centered and is variable in normal subjects tested under physiological loading conditions.
Orthogonal fluoroscopic images and magnetic resonance image-based computer models were used to characterize the centroids of articular cartilage contact of the glenohumeral joint at various static, actively stabilized abduction and rotation positions in five healthy shoulders. The shoulder was investigated at 0 degrees , 45 degrees , and 90 degrees abduction with neutral rotation and then at 90 degrees abduction combined with active maximal external rotation and active maximal internal rotation.
For all the investigated positions, the centroid of contact on the glenoid surface for each individual, on average, was more than 5 mm away from the geometric center of the glenoid articular surface. Intersubject variation of the centroid of articular contact on the glenoid surface was observed with each investigated position, and 90 degrees abduction with maximal internal rotation showed the least variability. On the humeral head surface, the centroids of contact were located at the superomedial quarter for all investigated positions, except in two subjects' positions at 0 degrees abduction, neutral rotation.
The data showed that the in vivo glenohumeral contact locations were variable among subjects, but in all individuals they were not at the center of the glenoid and humeral head surfaces. This confirms that "ball-in-socket" kinematics do not govern normal shoulder function. These insights into glenohumeral articular contact may be relevant to an appreciation of the consequences of pathology such as rotator cuff disease and instability.
关于肩肱关节正常的体内力学情况,人们了解甚少。这种认识对于治疗破坏肩部功能的疾病状况具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定正常受试者在肩部外展并伴有中立位、内旋和外旋时,肩胛盂与肱骨关节面之间的关节接触位置。我们假设在生理负荷条件下测试的正常受试者中,肩肱关节的关节接触并非完全居中且存在变化。
使用正交荧光透视图像和基于磁共振图像的计算机模型,对五个健康肩部在各种静态、主动稳定外展和旋转位置时肩肱关节的关节软骨接触质心进行表征。在中立旋转的0度、45度和90度外展位对肩部进行研究,然后在90度外展并结合主动最大外旋和主动最大内旋时进行研究。
对于所有研究位置,每个个体肩胛盂表面接触质心平均距离肩胛盂关节面几何中心超过5毫米。在每个研究位置都观察到肩胛盂表面关节接触质心的个体间差异,最大内旋90度外展时变异性最小。在肱骨头表面,除了两名受试者在0度外展、中立旋转位置外,所有研究位置的接触质心都位于上内侧象限。
数据表明,体内肩肱关节接触位置在受试者之间存在差异,但在所有个体中它们都不在肩胛盂和肱骨头表面的中心。这证实了“球窝”运动学并不支配正常肩部功能。这些关于肩肱关节接触的见解可能与理解诸如肩袖疾病和不稳定等病理后果相关。